1 00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,910 John Greenewald: Hey everyone, John Greenewald here. So today I 2 00:00:02,910 --> 00:00:06,030 shot an interview with Steven Green Street host of the 3 00:00:06,030 --> 00:00:10,290 basement office made through the New York Post. Just hours ago, 4 00:00:10,350 --> 00:00:14,280 he launched a 10 minute or so video detailing his struggle 5 00:00:14,520 --> 00:00:19,050 with the Pentagon while he's covered UFOs uaps and Luis 6 00:00:19,050 --> 00:00:23,700 Elizondo, he's the man who says he led the entire program with 7 00:00:23,700 --> 00:00:27,360 the Pentagon to investigate unidentified aerial phenomena. 8 00:00:27,930 --> 00:00:30,570 He dropped some great information in the video. And 9 00:00:30,570 --> 00:00:35,370 now he's here to share even more about his experience. So stay 10 00:00:35,370 --> 00:00:39,000 tuned, you're about to journey inside the black vault. 11 00:01:17,460 --> 00:01:19,920 That's right, everybody. As always, thank you so much for 12 00:01:19,920 --> 00:01:23,070 tuning in and making this your podcast or your live stream of 13 00:01:23,070 --> 00:01:26,160 choice. Now I'm excited about today's guest simply because 14 00:01:26,160 --> 00:01:29,130 I've wanted to get him on for a long time. I knew that there was 15 00:01:29,130 --> 00:01:33,060 a story here. I just didn't know exactly what the story was. And 16 00:01:33,060 --> 00:01:37,080 as of today, and kudos to him, he published quite a bit of the 17 00:01:37,080 --> 00:01:40,740 background that he's done investigating the claims about 18 00:01:40,740 --> 00:01:45,240 UFOs a tip Luis Elizondo with the Pentagon. Now a lot of you 19 00:01:45,240 --> 00:01:48,690 guys have heard me banter about that. But it's exciting for me 20 00:01:48,690 --> 00:01:51,060 that I get to pull on a journalist who has been 21 00:01:51,060 --> 00:01:55,290 investigating it himself, and has a much different experience 22 00:01:55,290 --> 00:01:58,980 with different details to tell Steven Green Street from the New 23 00:01:58,980 --> 00:02:01,530 York Post and the basement office, host of the basement 24 00:02:01,530 --> 00:02:04,890 office. Steven, thank you so much for taking the time to come 25 00:02:04,890 --> 00:02:07,890 in and join. Join us and talk about your experience. 26 00:02:09,120 --> 00:02:10,230 Steven Greenstreet: Oh, yeah, man, I wouldn't want to be 27 00:02:10,230 --> 00:02:15,420 anywhere else. Well, I'm excited to have you and, and the reason 28 00:02:15,420 --> 00:02:20,370 is, is because I know that that you have dug in, on this story, 29 00:02:20,400 --> 00:02:24,480 some of what you've published, and I and I just knew from from 30 00:02:24,900 --> 00:02:28,710 kind of seeing how you operate, and how you pursue stories, that 31 00:02:28,710 --> 00:02:33,210 there must be more to it. And I know that for a while now, you 32 00:02:33,210 --> 00:02:36,510 you've been pursuing quite a few different details. Today, you 33 00:02:36,510 --> 00:02:40,290 dropped a video. And before we get into that, I want you to 34 00:02:40,290 --> 00:02:43,950 just tell everybody, because a lot of people know you as the 35 00:02:43,950 --> 00:02:47,550 host of the basement office. But I want to know how you got 36 00:02:47,550 --> 00:02:52,290 there. How did you get involved with investigating UFOs writing 37 00:02:52,290 --> 00:02:57,900 about UFOs and ultimately, the basement office? Sure. So, you 38 00:02:57,900 --> 00:03:04,440 know, I was into UFOs as a kid, sci fi UFOs I've written 39 00:03:04,440 --> 00:03:08,370 Friedman book when I was 13. Like that kind of thing. The 40 00:03:08,370 --> 00:03:12,090 older I got, I kind of left UFOs in my childhood, like that's a 41 00:03:12,090 --> 00:03:14,820 thing that, you know, young people get excited about. 42 00:03:16,080 --> 00:03:21,180 But you know, I had a sighting a weird sighting in 2003, in Utah, 43 00:03:21,180 --> 00:03:23,460 which they talked about in the basement office, and you know, 44 00:03:23,460 --> 00:03:25,320 that was always in the back of my mind. And then when I started 45 00:03:25,320 --> 00:03:29,970 working at the post, every time a UFO story would come up, I, I 46 00:03:29,970 --> 00:03:33,600 would go Oh, and I would kind of Whisper and give them back 47 00:03:33,600 --> 00:03:36,510 stories and stuff. I found myself like, you know, I know 48 00:03:36,510 --> 00:03:39,120 this information. So I'll start you know, helping with these 49 00:03:39,120 --> 00:03:43,620 stories. And then when the the times came out with their 2017 50 00:03:43,620 --> 00:03:48,090 bombshell, I really picked my head up and said, Okay, guys, 51 00:03:48,420 --> 00:03:52,860 maybe I know a lot about this stuff. So maybe I should help 52 00:03:52,860 --> 00:03:55,680 out on the articles. And they came to me and said, Well, why 53 00:03:55,680 --> 00:03:58,830 don't you pitch a video series? Like, what kind of video video 54 00:03:58,830 --> 00:04:02,190 series should we do? And I pitched the basement office. And 55 00:04:02,190 --> 00:04:06,720 that's when I just went off a cliff. Just deep dive into every 56 00:04:07,020 --> 00:04:12,840 thing. And, and really, Let's release today is the book in to 57 00:04:12,840 --> 00:04:16,140 where I started, in many ways, because one of the first things 58 00:04:16,140 --> 00:04:21,120 I did, and back in two years ago was email the Pentagon. You 59 00:04:21,120 --> 00:04:24,060 know, just I didn't know how it works. I wasn't like you. I 60 00:04:24,060 --> 00:04:26,820 wasn't like a lot of you follow just were there. They've already 61 00:04:26,820 --> 00:04:30,090 been in the weeds for years. They know, the back and forth 62 00:04:30,090 --> 00:04:35,670 with offices and, and, and I was just like, Hey, Steve 63 00:04:35,670 --> 00:04:41,220 Greenstreet with the post like tell so a tip right. Cool and 64 00:04:41,250 --> 00:04:45,900 Elizondo. Right. I just didn't know how it works. And when 65 00:04:45,900 --> 00:04:49,140 Sherwin responded that I mean, in your in the first video 66 00:04:49,140 --> 00:04:55,260 because Sherwood responded that Yeah, a tip investigated UAP and 67 00:04:55,320 --> 00:04:57,720 I was kind of like, wow, they just came out and said it and 68 00:04:57,720 --> 00:04:59,850 then you were like, holy crap. They just came right out and 69 00:04:59,850 --> 00:05:05,580 said It now that was like the start of it. And today's report 70 00:05:05,580 --> 00:05:07,980 was like, two years in the making. 71 00:05:08,430 --> 00:05:11,130 John Greenewald: Yeah, that's, that's where obviously you and I 72 00:05:11,160 --> 00:05:15,540 really met and started talking because that statement did come 73 00:05:15,540 --> 00:05:20,730 out of left field because they were seemingly so. so adamant 74 00:05:20,730 --> 00:05:24,810 about saying no that that a tip did not research uaps then you 75 00:05:24,810 --> 00:05:28,320 get this bombshell statement that that really was I think I 76 00:05:28,320 --> 00:05:32,460 said the word shocking in your video, or something to that 77 00:05:32,460 --> 00:05:37,470 effect, because it was and and, and that's what really kind of 78 00:05:37,470 --> 00:05:40,650 surprised me about your original story. But what I also liked 79 00:05:40,650 --> 00:05:42,870 about you and I really want to compliment you about this, you 80 00:05:42,870 --> 00:05:46,230 just didn't do a one and done article. You stuck with it. You 81 00:05:46,230 --> 00:05:50,190 kept pursuing the story, you kept asking questions. What was 82 00:05:50,190 --> 00:05:53,070 that after that article when you got them to admit that they 83 00:05:53,070 --> 00:05:56,400 looked into UFOs and studied UFOs? What were you trying to do 84 00:05:56,400 --> 00:05:58,050 next? What were you pursuing? 85 00:05:58,440 --> 00:06:01,710 Steven Greenstreet: Oh, okay. So, you know, it should be 86 00:06:01,710 --> 00:06:06,360 stated that in that same response from Sherwood, where he 87 00:06:06,360 --> 00:06:11,430 said yes, a tip investigated UAP the next his next statement was 88 00:06:11,490 --> 00:06:15,660 but you know, Elizondo had no responsibilities with a tip. And 89 00:06:15,660 --> 00:06:19,710 at this point, at this point, like the History Channel had 90 00:06:19,710 --> 00:06:22,650 been announced, you know, hit the History Channel unidentified 91 00:06:22,650 --> 00:06:25,620 show starring Lou Elizondo is the former head of a tip, The 92 00:06:25,620 --> 00:06:29,850 New York Times, Politico, CNN, all of these big media companies 93 00:06:29,850 --> 00:06:34,680 were reporting, like without doubt that this is the former 94 00:06:34,800 --> 00:06:39,840 head of a tip like that there was no question marks in any of 95 00:06:39,840 --> 00:06:42,840 these articles. And so when I read a New York Times article, 96 00:06:42,930 --> 00:06:46,200 or Politico, or see a CNN report that says, here's the former 97 00:06:46,830 --> 00:06:51,390 director of a tip, I assume that that's cut that has come after a 98 00:06:51,390 --> 00:06:55,320 lot of reporting. And here's the Pentagon saying, nope, he 99 00:06:55,320 --> 00:07:00,060 wasn't. And I'm like, What? And at that point, I was the only 100 00:07:00,060 --> 00:07:05,220 one, apparently, to receive that statement, or, at least it 101 00:07:05,220 --> 00:07:09,780 hadn't been reported yet publicly. And I took that 102 00:07:09,780 --> 00:07:12,570 statement, I was so confused, because I thought it was all set 103 00:07:12,570 --> 00:07:16,140 in stone. And I was like, well, I can't just end here. I have to 104 00:07:16,140 --> 00:07:19,770 obviously follow up on this. Keep digging. Why is Elizondo 105 00:07:19,770 --> 00:07:22,020 saying this but the Pentagon saying something else? There's 106 00:07:22,050 --> 00:07:26,700 that's a story, you know, and so digging with Chris Sherwood, who 107 00:07:26,700 --> 00:07:30,690 I should say, I had a very positive experience with because 108 00:07:30,690 --> 00:07:34,590 he was very cool about, you know, responding to emails, I, 109 00:07:34,770 --> 00:07:37,290 I'd say, Hey, can you jump on the phone? He would jump on the 110 00:07:37,290 --> 00:07:40,800 phone, we would talk back and forth. And you know, obviously, 111 00:07:40,800 --> 00:07:45,330 he can't as a PA Oh, he can't just release statements that 112 00:07:45,330 --> 00:07:48,810 come to his head. No. So he wasn't like giving me full 113 00:07:48,810 --> 00:07:52,890 statements on the phone. He was it talking about the process 114 00:07:52,890 --> 00:07:56,790 that that he was going through in order to get me answers 115 00:07:56,790 --> 00:08:00,930 because I was like, You can't just say that I can you provide 116 00:08:00,930 --> 00:08:04,530 some documentation, essentially. And he and I went back and 117 00:08:04,530 --> 00:08:08,730 forth. He was looking for a loose employment records, like 118 00:08:08,730 --> 00:08:12,330 records that would Pentagon records that would, he would 119 00:08:12,330 --> 00:08:16,200 provide me that would show that, Oh, this is actually what he was 120 00:08:16,200 --> 00:08:20,040 doing. You know, and so I was like, great. Oh, yeah, hell 121 00:08:20,040 --> 00:08:24,090 yeah, offer those. Those are great. If I can get those, then 122 00:08:24,090 --> 00:08:27,630 I'll, you know, boom, that's the story. Pentagon says this, 123 00:08:27,660 --> 00:08:31,260 here's the documentation that never came. It was like a back 124 00:08:31,260 --> 00:08:35,340 and forth and back and forth. And eventually, I remember I 125 00:08:35,340 --> 00:08:39,660 called him. And I was like, Hey, man, I'm asking you Yes. or no 126 00:08:39,660 --> 00:08:44,790 questions. Did he do this? Did he not do this? You're saying no 127 00:08:44,790 --> 00:08:47,820 responsibilities, but you won't answer if he was involved at 128 00:08:47,820 --> 00:08:51,960 all. You know, I asked him, you know, was he at least involved 129 00:08:51,990 --> 00:08:55,500 in a tip? wouldn't answer No. Yes. You know, couldn't even 130 00:08:55,500 --> 00:08:58,410 answer a yes or no question which people who have never done 131 00:08:58,410 --> 00:09:03,240 this contacted the Pentagon. That's how it is. You just can't 132 00:09:03,240 --> 00:09:06,420 call up the Pentagon and say, Hey, was this guy Oh, is under 133 00:09:06,420 --> 00:09:10,680 party a tip? Oh, it was thanks by just never works like that. 134 00:09:10,890 --> 00:09:16,200 They he was so sure what discussed on how he was crafting 135 00:09:16,200 --> 00:09:21,600 a statement with Oh, usdi. So basically, you know, he had 136 00:09:22,800 --> 00:09:27,060 pianos have like a stack of previously approved statements. 137 00:09:27,090 --> 00:09:30,690 Yeah, they look through their stack. They have no comment 138 00:09:30,780 --> 00:09:33,360 that's been crafted. So they got to go out and reach out to the 139 00:09:33,360 --> 00:09:36,060 right people to get the right information to craft a 140 00:09:36,060 --> 00:09:39,450 statement. He was talking to me how he was with communicating 141 00:09:39,450 --> 00:09:43,650 with Oh, USDA, USDA, back and forth, trying to craft something 142 00:09:43,950 --> 00:09:49,200 and I got semi frustrated. And I think he got semi frustrated 143 00:09:49,200 --> 00:09:52,950 because I was just like, come on, man. Like what is going on 144 00:09:52,950 --> 00:09:57,600 over there? Like this should be a slam dunk question. He did. Or 145 00:09:57,600 --> 00:10:01,470 he didn't. Yeah. And he's like, I'll never forget this. He 146 00:10:01,470 --> 00:10:04,680 sighed and said, You know what, I'm not really happy with the 147 00:10:04,680 --> 00:10:09,660 way they're handling this story. And I was like, wow, what is 148 00:10:09,660 --> 00:10:15,060 going on behind the scenes here? Yeah. And so, you know, and sure 149 00:10:15,060 --> 00:10:17,880 would, uh, here I'll just show you like, this is just a 150 00:10:17,880 --> 00:10:24,690 sampling of coms that I thought was just with Sherwood. This is 151 00:10:24,690 --> 00:10:29,850 like this is this is Sherwood in golf, and stuff. And then like, 152 00:10:29,880 --> 00:10:33,210 kind of like my reporter notes, but like, I was going through my 153 00:10:33,210 --> 00:10:38,970 reporter notes. And another thing he's told me was, I wish 154 00:10:38,970 --> 00:10:42,390 the Pentagon could just get a handle on this thing and release 155 00:10:42,390 --> 00:10:46,470 clearer answers. So here's here's the guy that's in charge 156 00:10:46,500 --> 00:10:51,090 of releasing clear answers, essentially saying, I can't 157 00:10:51,090 --> 00:10:52,740 release clear answers. 158 00:10:54,120 --> 00:10:57,060 John Greenewald: I can't I wish they would get a handle on this 159 00:10:57,060 --> 00:11:01,290 so that I could release clear answers. Did you ever get a 160 00:11:01,290 --> 00:11:05,130 consensus of where this confusion was? Other than you 161 00:11:05,130 --> 00:11:08,490 know, clearly, he was frustrated, frustrated. But 162 00:11:08,490 --> 00:11:10,860 where's this confusion coming from? Shouldn't it be 163 00:11:10,860 --> 00:11:11,790 straightforward? 164 00:11:14,940 --> 00:11:19,080 Steven Greenstreet: I the only information that I that I know 165 00:11:19,080 --> 00:11:23,370 about is that he was in communication with Oh usdi 166 00:11:23,730 --> 00:11:29,970 looking for Lou Elizondo his employment records and trying to 167 00:11:30,060 --> 00:11:35,190 provide his what he thought was the most accurate information at 168 00:11:35,190 --> 00:11:38,190 the time that was hidden from him. I want to really give you 169 00:11:38,190 --> 00:11:42,180 the the most accurate information we have. And it was 170 00:11:42,180 --> 00:11:47,190 in that process that he became that he became frustrated with 171 00:11:47,250 --> 00:11:48,870 with the way things were going, I guess. 172 00:11:49,380 --> 00:11:52,500 John Greenewald: So at one point then golf took over Susan golf 173 00:11:52,500 --> 00:11:58,650 who, you know, has become, sadly a meme when it comes to UFO 174 00:11:58,650 --> 00:12:02,190 Twitter and stuff like that. And she's obviously heavily 175 00:12:02,190 --> 00:12:07,530 attacked, but she takes over sure what is no more you were 176 00:12:07,530 --> 00:12:11,040 obviously around for that transition. Did you get any 177 00:12:11,040 --> 00:12:17,190 indication on why? Sherwood's goes away? And golf takes over? 178 00:12:19,920 --> 00:12:24,780 Steven Greenstreet: No, I'm so in looking at my email chains 179 00:12:24,810 --> 00:12:29,070 with Sherwood. He was very responsive. I'd sent him an 180 00:12:29,070 --> 00:12:32,070 email, he replied, send him an email, he'd reply, send him an 181 00:12:32,070 --> 00:12:36,960 email, he'd reply. And then as soon after he started to, I 182 00:12:36,960 --> 00:12:42,120 guess, break Be honest with me on the phone. no reply. no 183 00:12:42,120 --> 00:12:47,970 reply. no reply. no reply. Susan Gough replies so it was like it 184 00:12:47,970 --> 00:12:52,200 was almost like he was just stopped communicating with me. 185 00:12:52,200 --> 00:12:57,780 And then Susan Goff came in I guess in June. So this meet this 186 00:12:57,780 --> 00:13:01,440 back and forth with with Sherwood was in May 2019. And 187 00:13:01,440 --> 00:13:05,850 then yeah, and around June is when golf would be cc on some of 188 00:13:05,850 --> 00:13:11,520 those previous Sherwood emails with me, she BCC and moving 189 00:13:11,520 --> 00:13:16,620 forward. Chris was CCD on a lot of the golf responses, but he 190 00:13:16,620 --> 00:13:19,950 never directly replied to me until months later. 191 00:13:20,760 --> 00:13:23,190 John Greenewald: Did you find it strange that she all of a sudden 192 00:13:23,190 --> 00:13:26,430 popped up on your cc list? Or did you get an introduction? Or 193 00:13:28,260 --> 00:13:30,600 was that strange like that? To me? That's a little strange. 194 00:13:31,530 --> 00:13:34,200 Steven Greenstreet: No, I just I mean, to me at the time, not 195 00:13:34,230 --> 00:13:37,710 being a novice and not knowing how this works. I just assumed, 196 00:13:38,070 --> 00:13:40,740 okay, they're just bringing people into the loop so that 197 00:13:40,740 --> 00:13:43,890 they're all on the same page. I just assumed it didn't seem 198 00:13:43,890 --> 00:13:49,020 weird to me until he went away. And Sue, obviously, is the 199 00:13:49,020 --> 00:13:54,060 complete opposite of Sherwood, not very communicative, won't 200 00:13:54,060 --> 00:13:58,440 hop on the phone with you. Yeah. Is very short and sweet. And to 201 00:13:58,440 --> 00:14:02,520 the point and won't go into further detail. Which if you 202 00:14:02,520 --> 00:14:08,400 think about it is probably a really good PA. Oh, yeah. 203 00:14:08,790 --> 00:14:11,430 John Greenewald: I mean, I hate to say it that way. Sweet. Maybe 204 00:14:11,430 --> 00:14:15,420 debatable, but every other word you just used would definitely 205 00:14:15,420 --> 00:14:19,470 fit. But yeah, you can't corner her so to speak. You can't get 206 00:14:19,470 --> 00:14:23,040 her on the phone. It is only by email, and you got to be lucky 207 00:14:23,040 --> 00:14:27,510 to get a response. I mean, it really comes down to luck, in my 208 00:14:27,510 --> 00:14:30,300 opinion. I mean, there's no art about it to get her to answer 209 00:14:30,300 --> 00:14:33,510 you it. I think it just comes down to if she feels like 210 00:14:33,510 --> 00:14:37,980 responding she will. If not, she doesn't. There's one thing that 211 00:14:37,980 --> 00:14:40,230 I want to ask you about. And I don't know if you can answer it, 212 00:14:40,230 --> 00:14:43,230 and it's okay if you can't, but I know that you've gotten a 213 00:14:43,230 --> 00:14:48,450 little bit crap from some corners of the universe for not 214 00:14:48,450 --> 00:14:52,890 reporting. Let's say the Elizondo part of the statement 215 00:14:52,920 --> 00:14:56,130 and so on and so forth. And I feel that that's incredibly 216 00:14:56,130 --> 00:14:59,130 unfair, and I'm not speaking for you, but where I think that 217 00:14:59,130 --> 00:15:01,830 that's very unfair. Fair as we don't know what was going on 218 00:15:01,830 --> 00:15:04,590 behind the scenes. I want to give you the opportunity to 219 00:15:04,590 --> 00:15:08,160 address that if you want. If not, I can move on. But do you? 220 00:15:08,190 --> 00:15:11,520 Do you want to address the naysayers on? You sat on this, 221 00:15:11,520 --> 00:15:14,550 you ignored it. We don't need to name names, but you know that 222 00:15:14,550 --> 00:15:18,450 you didn't do your job? from hearing your talk. It makes me 223 00:15:18,450 --> 00:15:22,740 feel like you actually were doing your job. But let me pass 224 00:15:22,740 --> 00:15:31,080 it to you. Is there anything you want to address on that? Hold 225 00:15:31,080 --> 00:15:31,290 on, I 226 00:15:31,290 --> 00:15:33,450 Steven Greenstreet: lost everything. I sure know. Okay, 227 00:15:33,450 --> 00:15:37,890 cool. Yeah, sure. I'll address that. So back in May 2019, when 228 00:15:37,890 --> 00:15:46,020 I was this kind of, you know, wet, green novice, UFO reporter. 229 00:15:46,590 --> 00:15:50,550 When I got that statement that within the same email, a tip 230 00:15:50,610 --> 00:15:58,110 investigated UAP. But lazada had responsibilities. I was going to 231 00:15:58,110 --> 00:16:02,730 do a story touching on both. And as we develop the story, and I 232 00:16:02,730 --> 00:16:06,150 wrote the story, it we realize those are two separate stories. 233 00:16:06,390 --> 00:16:09,600 One about the, you know, the Pentagon revealing for the first 234 00:16:09,600 --> 00:16:12,930 time that they investigated uaps that was like a button story. 235 00:16:12,930 --> 00:16:17,490 And then the Pentagon denying Elizondo, and the whole Elizondo 236 00:16:17,490 --> 00:16:20,610 backstory was like its own story, which obviously, it is, 237 00:16:20,610 --> 00:16:24,720 it's like, it's almost two separate things. And so I didn't 238 00:16:24,720 --> 00:16:28,320 want to just release the cookie cutter Pentagon statement, 239 00:16:28,470 --> 00:16:30,780 especially after Chris said he was going to provide 240 00:16:30,780 --> 00:16:33,420 documentation. I was like, Oh, hell yeah, like, that'll be 241 00:16:33,420 --> 00:16:39,510 great for an article. And I almost think like, this is just 242 00:16:39,510 --> 00:16:43,170 me personal. So I have no evidence of this, but just how I 243 00:16:43,170 --> 00:16:48,720 felt was I made the mistake of inferring that I won't run a 244 00:16:48,720 --> 00:16:53,400 story until I get further documentation, if you can 245 00:16:53,400 --> 00:16:59,070 provide it. And they, I think they probably pushed me along 246 00:16:59,130 --> 00:17:01,560 and carried me along on that. Yeah, we're working to get the 247 00:17:01,560 --> 00:17:04,560 documentation. Oh, we're working to get the documentation or 248 00:17:04,560 --> 00:17:08,910 days, days, days, weeks, you know, trying, as this developed. 249 00:17:09,390 --> 00:17:14,520 And by that point, you know, the intercept launched an article on 250 00:17:14,880 --> 00:17:18,390 the Pentagon statement that I had, and then others, you know, 251 00:17:18,420 --> 00:17:21,960 published that statement, you included this this statement. 252 00:17:22,860 --> 00:17:27,570 And at that point, with no documentation that ever came, 253 00:17:27,600 --> 00:17:31,650 Chris Sherwood disappearing, others already scooping me and 254 00:17:31,650 --> 00:17:35,580 reporting essentially the same thing. I moved on. And I mean, 255 00:17:35,580 --> 00:17:42,330 literally 90% of my job is not UFO. Yeah, I am not. I am not a 256 00:17:42,330 --> 00:17:46,740 full time UFO reporter. I do everything. If you go to the 257 00:17:46,740 --> 00:17:51,240 post YouTube page, anything that's been produced documentary 258 00:17:51,240 --> 00:17:56,430 style stuff, I probably did. Or was part of it. 90% or so at 259 00:17:56,430 --> 00:18:00,240 that point, it was just moving on to other assigned 260 00:18:00,270 --> 00:18:03,750 responsibilities. Yeah, I was given up their assigned 261 00:18:03,750 --> 00:18:07,020 responsibilities. And it was just, you know, moving on, but 262 00:18:07,020 --> 00:18:11,970 that didn't stop me from in my spare time. And, you know, 263 00:18:12,000 --> 00:18:17,820 bootstrapping, to steal a phrase continuing the conversation with 264 00:18:18,660 --> 00:18:21,060 golf and and the Pentagon. So that's, 265 00:18:21,240 --> 00:18:22,950 John Greenewald: that's literally what happened. It's 266 00:18:22,950 --> 00:18:25,800 not like salacious and nefarious. It's that's just 267 00:18:25,800 --> 00:18:30,000 literally what happened. Did the documentation because my ears 268 00:18:30,000 --> 00:18:33,780 always perked up whenever I hear the D word. Come up again with 269 00:18:33,780 --> 00:18:36,330 Susan golf. Because if you were going back and forth with 270 00:18:36,330 --> 00:18:40,920 Sherwood for so long, and that documentation was promised, did 271 00:18:40,920 --> 00:18:44,370 that ever get pushed again or talked about? 272 00:18:47,160 --> 00:18:50,220 Steven Greenstreet: Okay, so I actually was looking through my 273 00:18:50,220 --> 00:18:55,560 emails, and I brought it up at least two more times. After 274 00:18:55,560 --> 00:18:59,550 that, where I said, Hey, do you have an update? You promised 275 00:18:59,550 --> 00:19:04,440 this or you were at least Looking for this? Was Did you 276 00:19:04,440 --> 00:19:08,100 ever acquire that? What's the update on that? And as far as I 277 00:19:08,100 --> 00:19:10,980 remember, I mean, I've got a ton of emails as far as I know, it 278 00:19:10,980 --> 00:19:14,280 was never addressed again, never brought up again, never 279 00:19:14,280 --> 00:19:14,880 addressed. 280 00:19:15,030 --> 00:19:17,640 John Greenewald: And they just never they just ignored your 281 00:19:17,640 --> 00:19:20,100 request, even after promises. 282 00:19:21,330 --> 00:19:24,330 Steven Greenstreet: Oh, yeah. And then after, I guess, was it 283 00:19:24,330 --> 00:19:30,240 Roger glass cell? And you I forget who first but December 284 00:19:30,240 --> 00:19:37,320 2019. When they when su golf released the a tip had nothing 285 00:19:37,320 --> 00:19:43,830 to do with Yeah, with UAP. I was furious. I was so I was so 286 00:19:43,830 --> 00:19:46,980 frustrated. Yeah. And I sent off an email where I went back 287 00:19:46,980 --> 00:19:50,700 through all of my Sherwood golf emails and I said, you guys said 288 00:19:50,700 --> 00:19:54,810 this on this date. You're now saying this, you said that you 289 00:19:54,810 --> 00:19:57,480 provided me with the most accurate information. And now 290 00:19:57,480 --> 00:20:00,570 you're saying this and I had this bullet pointed email. Now, 291 00:20:00,810 --> 00:20:04,410 that mostly went unanswered, I think they said, I think golf 292 00:20:04,440 --> 00:20:07,740 replied with one or two sentences. But all of my point 293 00:20:07,740 --> 00:20:09,630 by points were never addressed. 294 00:20:10,200 --> 00:20:12,960 John Greenewald: I, Roger may have got it. I've shouted him 295 00:20:12,960 --> 00:20:16,110 out many times on this program. He does great work and pursues 296 00:20:16,110 --> 00:20:20,790 the story. I will say I did I think that I was the first 297 00:20:20,820 --> 00:20:24,990 simply because I remember the situation. And it was odd. I was 298 00:20:24,990 --> 00:20:31,110 not pushing the Hey, you said, a tip studied you a piece now? Or 299 00:20:31,110 --> 00:20:33,690 do you want to change your mind? Do you want to go back on that, 300 00:20:33,690 --> 00:20:37,560 like I was I was accused of that. But I wasn't, I was going 301 00:20:37,560 --> 00:20:41,880 after something else. And in this in the course of of going 302 00:20:41,880 --> 00:20:45,630 back and forth with emails, she had essentially brought it up 303 00:20:45,630 --> 00:20:49,890 and said that I'm paraphrasing, but essentially, that they 304 00:20:49,890 --> 00:20:53,790 needed to correct the record on a tip, that sure what had 305 00:20:53,790 --> 00:20:56,010 obviously released that statement, but she had taken 306 00:20:56,010 --> 00:21:00,300 aback, and I immediately reached out to you and went Oh, great. 307 00:21:00,510 --> 00:21:03,030 You know, that's all I need is for Greenstreet to think I'm 308 00:21:03,030 --> 00:21:07,470 attacking him. But rather the story was the flip flop. Not 309 00:21:07,470 --> 00:21:10,800 necessarily that I believed this side or that side, but rather 310 00:21:10,800 --> 00:21:15,060 that the flip flop. And and I don't blame you for being 311 00:21:15,060 --> 00:21:18,720 frustrated, because I mean, I've had it happen to me as well, 312 00:21:18,720 --> 00:21:22,590 where they'll say one thing, and then take it back. And then the 313 00:21:22,590 --> 00:21:26,850 name example is a prime thing that I still get attacked for 314 00:21:26,850 --> 00:21:30,420 but I don't regret pushing the issue, but the name of a tip and 315 00:21:30,420 --> 00:21:33,900 what the acronym stood for. And there was documentation to say 316 00:21:33,900 --> 00:21:37,320 that, you know, it was aviation versus aerospace. Then there 317 00:21:37,320 --> 00:21:40,260 were statements that said it was aviation, and it was this big 318 00:21:40,260 --> 00:21:43,230 mess. But I know that frustration when they say 319 00:21:43,230 --> 00:21:48,360 something to you, and then later take it back working for a big 320 00:21:48,360 --> 00:21:50,460 outfit. Like I'm sorry, go ahead. 321 00:21:52,620 --> 00:21:54,420 Steven Greenstreet: Yeah, and but it wasn't just the 322 00:21:54,420 --> 00:22:00,150 statement, it was the fact that I felt I had done due diligence, 323 00:22:00,270 --> 00:22:05,940 back in May 2019. After they gave me that statement. Where I 324 00:22:05,940 --> 00:22:09,540 didn't just take it and run with it. I was back and forth, back 325 00:22:09,540 --> 00:22:14,250 and forth. Where he saying I'm I'm back and forth with a usdi 326 00:22:14,310 --> 00:22:17,760 I'm quote, trying to find the most accurate information 327 00:22:17,760 --> 00:22:22,350 regarding all of this, where he was, it was days of him 328 00:22:22,380 --> 00:22:25,770 supposedly researching this finding the most accurate answer 329 00:22:25,770 --> 00:22:29,490 and then providing that answer. In the end, the most accurate 330 00:22:29,490 --> 00:22:34,260 answers where Lou Elizondo had no responsibilities. But yes, a 331 00:22:34,260 --> 00:22:39,270 tip researched UAP. You know, it's like, how could you get it 332 00:22:39,270 --> 00:22:41,580 wrong? What's essentially my attitude? How did you get that 333 00:22:41,580 --> 00:22:45,390 so wrong? After supposedly spending days and days and days 334 00:22:45,510 --> 00:22:49,200 digging with, you know, oh, usdi, it's basic. It's basically 335 00:22:49,200 --> 00:22:53,460 like, how can you get a yes or no question. So wrong. When you 336 00:22:53,460 --> 00:22:57,900 have spent days and days and days, back and forth, 337 00:22:57,900 --> 00:23:00,480 researching, digging up the facts to give me the most 338 00:23:00,480 --> 00:23:04,290 accurate information? How can you get that wrong? You know, 339 00:23:04,290 --> 00:23:08,580 like, it's not like, I could understand one statement after 340 00:23:08,580 --> 00:23:13,320 one day, but the amount of time Chris, supposedly put into that 341 00:23:13,320 --> 00:23:16,170 statement, I just don't buy it. Something's going on at the 342 00:23:16,170 --> 00:23:16,710 Pentagon, 343 00:23:17,100 --> 00:23:19,470 John Greenewald: you obviously work for a mainstream outlet. 344 00:23:20,040 --> 00:23:24,810 Why do you think that there's no repercussions for the Pentagon? 345 00:23:25,140 --> 00:23:29,640 Giving a statement and having a big outlet report something as 346 00:23:29,640 --> 00:23:34,980 true, just to retract the whole thing, and literally do a 180 347 00:23:35,310 --> 00:23:36,600 within six months? 348 00:23:36,990 --> 00:23:37,440 Unknown: How 349 00:23:39,030 --> 00:23:40,320 John Greenewald: do you feel that there should be 350 00:23:40,320 --> 00:23:43,740 repercussions for that? I mean, is there a consensus? Not that 351 00:23:43,740 --> 00:23:47,490 you speak for the New York Post? And I don't? I'm not asking you 352 00:23:47,490 --> 00:23:51,690 to, but working for a big outlet? What is the consensus 353 00:23:51,690 --> 00:23:56,250 when that happens? Because the essentially journalism itself is 354 00:23:56,250 --> 00:23:56,820 attacked. 355 00:24:00,540 --> 00:24:04,020 Steven Greenstreet: Yeah, I mean, I can, I can speak for me, 356 00:24:04,020 --> 00:24:11,070 which is two things. One, that's outrageous. I mean, but you 357 00:24:11,070 --> 00:24:14,070 don't want to just put a period on that you want to like I did 358 00:24:14,070 --> 00:24:20,880 reach out and find out what the hell happened. You know why? And 359 00:24:20,970 --> 00:24:28,080 I, the answer that I got from God, literally, was, well, that 360 00:24:28,080 --> 00:24:32,670 was the information Chris had at the time, I have now acquired 361 00:24:32,850 --> 00:24:36,630 new information, better information and more accurate 362 00:24:36,630 --> 00:24:39,630 information than what Chris had at the time. And that new 363 00:24:39,630 --> 00:24:46,290 information says a tip was not about UAP. So that's, I 364 00:24:46,290 --> 00:24:49,050 John Greenewald: wish I could be a fly on the wall to figure out 365 00:24:49,200 --> 00:24:52,680 the conversations on the inside when Susan golf gets involved 366 00:24:52,680 --> 00:24:55,260 and says, Well, you just didn't have the right information even 367 00:24:55,260 --> 00:24:57,720 though you put the weight of the Pentagon behind your statement 368 00:24:57,930 --> 00:25:00,330 and go ahead and change it because my information And is 369 00:25:00,330 --> 00:25:04,440 better? Who the heck did he talked to that she, you know, 370 00:25:04,470 --> 00:25:08,370 either got somebody higher or whatever. To me. It's just 371 00:25:08,400 --> 00:25:13,260 utterly confusing, but be that as it may, in the remaining time 372 00:25:13,260 --> 00:25:15,240 that I have left with you, because I know I pulled you away 373 00:25:15,240 --> 00:25:17,490 from quite a few different responsibilities assigned 374 00:25:17,490 --> 00:25:21,030 responsibilities today. One thing I do want to ask you about 375 00:25:21,030 --> 00:25:24,180 is the fact that you've talked to Elizondo interviewed 376 00:25:24,180 --> 00:25:28,110 Elizondo, you've got videos with him as well. I urge everybody to 377 00:25:28,140 --> 00:25:30,570 watch those as well. They're, they're great. And you've 378 00:25:30,570 --> 00:25:34,650 brought this up to him. Can I ask Stephen Green Street? Not 379 00:25:34,650 --> 00:25:38,250 the journalist, not the New York Post. But Steven, how do you 380 00:25:38,250 --> 00:25:43,560 feel about the story when it comes to Lewis Elizondo, and the 381 00:25:43,920 --> 00:25:47,970 statements that the Pentagon has said against him? challenging 382 00:25:47,970 --> 00:25:51,510 his integrity? Do you have thoughts on what's going on 383 00:25:51,510 --> 00:25:53,310 here? And who is telling the truth? 384 00:25:55,980 --> 00:25:58,710 Steven Greenstreet: Sure, if I've learned one thing about 385 00:25:58,740 --> 00:26:04,560 government pa O is every single word matters. So I think a lot 386 00:26:04,560 --> 00:26:07,410 of people read a statement as a statement, go back and read that 387 00:26:07,410 --> 00:26:11,220 statement as a series of words and every word matters. And 388 00:26:11,220 --> 00:26:14,190 you'll notice in their first statement said he had no 389 00:26:14,190 --> 00:26:17,670 responsibilities. Their second statement, he said, they said he 390 00:26:17,670 --> 00:26:22,620 has no assigned responsibilities. Why? They 391 00:26:22,620 --> 00:26:26,430 didn't just throw that word in there. That word was crafted 392 00:26:26,430 --> 00:26:31,680 that word was decided by committee. Let's add a sign. 393 00:26:31,710 --> 00:26:37,080 What does that mean? They're playing a game. They're playing 394 00:26:37,080 --> 00:26:42,030 a game and hoping not too many people notice, in my opinion. So 395 00:26:42,030 --> 00:26:45,900 what does it tell me? They're there. They might be technically 396 00:26:45,900 --> 00:26:50,310 truth, the truth, while at the same time getting their way on 397 00:26:50,550 --> 00:26:54,240 this guy that they perhaps don't like that much. So we had no 398 00:26:54,240 --> 00:26:57,660 assigned responsibility. So did he have any responsibilities? 399 00:26:57,690 --> 00:26:59,820 They wouldn't answer that question. When I asked. Did he 400 00:26:59,820 --> 00:27:02,520 have any involvement? They wouldn't answer that question. 401 00:27:02,550 --> 00:27:05,940 When I asked. They would only answer whether he was director 402 00:27:06,000 --> 00:27:09,870 or not. Of the, you know, and here, let me just tell you this 403 00:27:09,870 --> 00:27:16,110 because not many people know this, but Dana White. Um, you 404 00:27:16,110 --> 00:27:20,010 know, in Politico in the December 2017 Politico article, 405 00:27:20,310 --> 00:27:22,830 Brian bender mentions he spoke with Dana White, who, you know, 406 00:27:22,830 --> 00:27:27,210 at the time was, I believe at the time was the Pentagon. She 407 00:27:27,210 --> 00:27:32,040 was the main spokesperson. Yeah. And yeah, and she confirmed 408 00:27:32,040 --> 00:27:37,290 Elizondo was the director per the article of a tip, and that a 409 00:27:37,290 --> 00:27:41,790 tip was about uaps, etc, etc. It wasn't it wasn't a release 410 00:27:41,790 --> 00:27:44,370 statement, meaning it wasn't a quote, it was like a paraphrase 411 00:27:44,370 --> 00:27:47,340 of something she had said. And there's been a lot of debate 412 00:27:47,340 --> 00:27:53,820 about that. Dana White, a quote. And, you know, I spoke to Dana 413 00:27:53,820 --> 00:28:00,390 White. I spoke to her on the phone. And, in fact, I shared 414 00:28:00,390 --> 00:28:03,300 this on Twitter was I was shooting a Katy Perry interview. 415 00:28:04,170 --> 00:28:08,730 I was shooting a Katy Perry interview, and I was about to 416 00:28:08,730 --> 00:28:11,310 roll with Katy Perry when Dana White called me and I like 417 00:28:11,610 --> 00:28:15,540 absconded to like a dark hallway. And Dana White told me 418 00:28:15,570 --> 00:28:20,910 Yes, Lou Elizondo ran a tip. And then she said, but running 419 00:28:20,910 --> 00:28:25,020 things means many different things in government to run 420 00:28:25,080 --> 00:28:27,990 something can mean many different things she didn't 421 00:28:27,990 --> 00:28:31,410 expand on, on what that meant. And so it just to add to the 422 00:28:31,410 --> 00:28:34,890 confusion of what that is how I feel, personally, is I feel Lou 423 00:28:34,890 --> 00:28:38,430 Elizondo was involved with a tip. I don't think there's any 424 00:28:38,430 --> 00:28:43,800 doubt. Yeah, about Lou's involvement with the study of 425 00:28:44,250 --> 00:28:50,190 UAP intelligence well, within the Pentagon. But I think this 426 00:28:50,190 --> 00:28:53,670 is a big story. I really do. I think it's one of the biggest 427 00:28:53,670 --> 00:28:56,700 stories that's right under the surface that not a lot of people 428 00:28:56,700 --> 00:29:00,780 are paying attention to. And it's bubbling up. It's bubbling 429 00:29:00,780 --> 00:29:03,240 up, I mean, Lou's filing complaints with the Pentagon. 430 00:29:03,270 --> 00:29:06,060 It's just back and forth. It's bubbling, it's leading 431 00:29:06,060 --> 00:29:09,000 somewhere, you know, and I'm trying to tell people like, this 432 00:29:09,000 --> 00:29:12,750 is a story that could potentially just boom, 433 00:29:13,890 --> 00:29:16,170 John Greenewald: it amazes me, because generally, if somebody 434 00:29:16,170 --> 00:29:19,980 is coming out and lying, and they're making up a story, when 435 00:29:19,980 --> 00:29:22,500 they're called out, especially when the weight of the Pentagon 436 00:29:22,500 --> 00:29:25,530 starts essentially attacking them in statements, I would 437 00:29:25,530 --> 00:29:29,490 think they'd go away. And rather, Lou is actually 438 00:29:29,490 --> 00:29:32,820 escalating everything by filing that complaint pushing for the 439 00:29:32,820 --> 00:29:38,310 DOJ big to get involved. Now, the DOJ big is involved. And we 440 00:29:38,310 --> 00:29:42,510 don't know exactly how that's gonna turn out. But you know, 441 00:29:42,510 --> 00:29:46,710 I'm popping popcorn at this point, because I'm really 442 00:29:46,710 --> 00:29:50,550 curious to see how all that comes out. In the last couple of 443 00:29:50,550 --> 00:29:53,400 minutes. I want to ask you one other thing on on Dana White 444 00:29:53,400 --> 00:29:56,460 when she said that leading things means different things. 445 00:29:57,720 --> 00:30:01,560 Was there anything else in that conversation that I can poke 446 00:30:01,560 --> 00:30:05,520 yond to see that came out. I mean, did you ask her? Hey, what 447 00:30:05,520 --> 00:30:09,090 does that mean? Did she say? Yes, he ran it hang up. Did she 448 00:30:09,090 --> 00:30:12,810 have any thoughts about the Pentagon's change of stance? 449 00:30:15,330 --> 00:30:17,850 Steven Greenstreet: She actually would not speak to that. And I 450 00:30:17,850 --> 00:30:23,940 think, you know, that was just like, um, she there was it, she 451 00:30:23,940 --> 00:30:26,700 didn't seem to, she didn't have any grudges or anything. She was 452 00:30:26,700 --> 00:30:31,770 very professional. And I don't think she wanted to speak to her 453 00:30:31,770 --> 00:30:35,130 former office, you know, like, she wanted to just provide me 454 00:30:35,130 --> 00:30:38,670 what she knew personally, and then didn't want to speak about 455 00:30:38,880 --> 00:30:42,540 what was going on rolled office, currently, which I can respect, 456 00:30:42,570 --> 00:30:46,680 you know, on a national level. And honestly, at the time, this 457 00:30:46,680 --> 00:30:52,020 was two years ago, I was rushed to interview a pop star. And so 458 00:30:52,020 --> 00:30:55,980 I didn't have much time to ask her follow up questions. And the 459 00:30:55,980 --> 00:30:59,220 only pertinent information that I got from her was, you know, a 460 00:30:59,220 --> 00:31:04,170 second confirmation from Dana White, that Lou quote, ran a 461 00:31:04,170 --> 00:31:07,320 tip. But what was interesting to me is running things in 462 00:31:07,320 --> 00:31:10,590 government can mean many different things. So that was 463 00:31:10,590 --> 00:31:12,840 like the main takeaway for me from Dana White. 464 00:31:12,990 --> 00:31:16,080 John Greenewald: Yeah. And that's you answered my my next 465 00:31:16,080 --> 00:31:19,590 one of what that main takeaway was, which is that she confirmed 466 00:31:19,800 --> 00:31:22,710 Politico's reporting because it has been controversial. He 467 00:31:22,710 --> 00:31:25,620 didn't have a quote, I've questioned it myself full 468 00:31:25,620 --> 00:31:30,120 disclosure, but you actually traced Dana White down. So kudos 469 00:31:30,120 --> 00:31:33,960 to you for for tracing the story. I think in the last 470 00:31:34,080 --> 00:31:37,320 minute or so here, I want you to also point out one other thing 471 00:31:37,350 --> 00:31:40,650 that you had found out, which I found incredibly interesting in 472 00:31:40,650 --> 00:31:43,830 your video, and then and then we'll go ahead and wrap it up. 473 00:31:43,830 --> 00:31:47,550 And I'll urge everybody to watch it, which is in the link below. 474 00:31:47,940 --> 00:31:51,810 But you had learned from the Defense Intelligence Agency, 475 00:31:52,110 --> 00:31:55,890 when the DEA was still speaking for themselves. And Susan Goff 476 00:31:55,890 --> 00:32:00,120 didn't take over that Luis Elizondo had played a role in 477 00:32:00,120 --> 00:32:06,210 the transferring of the a tip program from DEA to essentially 478 00:32:06,210 --> 00:32:11,040 OSD. You had a great point, that would be an assigned 479 00:32:11,040 --> 00:32:13,770 responsibility. So you threw that to the Pentagon and I'll 480 00:32:13,770 --> 00:32:17,130 let you take it from there. You asked them what did they say? 481 00:32:19,260 --> 00:32:22,530 Steven Greenstreet: Okay, yes, sir. James kudla at the book at 482 00:32:22,530 --> 00:32:27,660 the Defense Intelligence Agency, was quite specific with me in 483 00:32:27,660 --> 00:32:33,330 saying Lou Elizondo helped transfer a tip from DEA to 484 00:32:33,330 --> 00:32:37,380 another office. And as I show in the video, I brought that up to 485 00:32:37,380 --> 00:32:40,320 golf and Sherwood and Sherwood replied saying, Yeah, we don't 486 00:32:40,350 --> 00:32:47,070 disagree with that. That's like, what, like, you told me he had 487 00:32:47,070 --> 00:32:51,330 no responsibilities with a tip. This guy said he did. You're 488 00:32:51,330 --> 00:32:53,640 saying you're gonna disagree with him? Would you like to 489 00:32:53,640 --> 00:32:59,700 amend your statement? And they said, No. They said the former 490 00:32:59,730 --> 00:33:03,450 the previous statement stands. And like I said, in the video to 491 00:33:03,450 --> 00:33:05,790 this day, they're still releasing the same statement. 492 00:33:06,030 --> 00:33:11,910 And so just to be technical, let's be technical. If difa says 493 00:33:11,910 --> 00:33:15,300 he had an assigned responsibility, you agree with 494 00:33:15,300 --> 00:33:19,590 the CIA statement? Then your current statement that he had no 495 00:33:19,680 --> 00:33:23,340 responsibilities with? A tip is not it's just because Is that 496 00:33:23,340 --> 00:33:24,330 accurate? Yeah. 497 00:33:25,110 --> 00:33:27,540 John Greenewald: Yeah. And they wouldn't change it. They they 498 00:33:27,540 --> 00:33:28,470 dug their heels in? 499 00:33:30,240 --> 00:33:33,510 Steven Greenstreet: Yeah, I reached out to them. Many times, 500 00:33:33,510 --> 00:33:37,230 man, I don't. They don't they rarely she rarely, if ever 501 00:33:37,230 --> 00:33:40,800 replies to me now. Yeah. Ever replies to me. I think I'm on 502 00:33:40,800 --> 00:33:43,530 some kind of Pentagon blacklist. And yeah, 503 00:33:43,530 --> 00:33:48,060 John Greenewald: I've I feel I'm on the same list. So welcome to 504 00:33:48,060 --> 00:33:50,850 the club. I don't think we're getting holiday greeting cards 505 00:33:50,850 --> 00:33:53,880 this year. But, you know, Steven, I really do appreciate 506 00:33:53,880 --> 00:33:56,130 it. Like I said, a couple minutes ago, I know I pulled you 507 00:33:56,130 --> 00:33:58,950 away from other responsibilities that you do have today. But 508 00:33:58,950 --> 00:34:02,280 thank you for at least giving us a little bit of insight into 509 00:34:02,520 --> 00:34:05,970 your experience, you know, because you were definitely in 510 00:34:05,970 --> 00:34:08,040 the thick of it. I hope you stick with it. I know you will 511 00:34:08,040 --> 00:34:10,890 with the basement office. It sounds like but also future 512 00:34:10,890 --> 00:34:14,460 stories. But thank you for taking the time. I really do 513 00:34:14,460 --> 00:34:15,150 appreciate it. 514 00:34:16,620 --> 00:34:18,150 Steven Greenstreet: Sure. Thanks, john. 515 00:34:18,180 --> 00:34:19,980 John Greenewald: Thank you. Thank you. And thank you all for 516 00:34:19,980 --> 00:34:22,590 listening and watching. This is John Greenewald, Jr, signing 517 00:34:22,590 --> 00:34:23,730 off. We'll see you next time.