1
00:00:23,280 --> 00:00:25,380
John Greenewald: That's right
everybody. As always, thank you

2
00:00:25,380 --> 00:00:29,460
so much for tuning in and taking
this journey inside the black

3
00:00:29,460 --> 00:00:32,640
vault with me. I'm your host,
John Greenewald, Jr, founder and

4
00:00:32,640 --> 00:00:36,900
creator of the black vault calm.
And thank you for joining me as

5
00:00:36,900 --> 00:00:41,640
we do this deep dive into the
release, or at least a partial

6
00:00:41,640 --> 00:00:45,990
release of the classified UAP
report. Now, if you haven't seen

7
00:00:45,990 --> 00:00:49,230
any of the news articles, I'm
very thankful that quite a few

8
00:00:49,230 --> 00:00:52,350
different media agencies and
outlets have covered this now,

9
00:00:52,650 --> 00:00:58,050
where since since June of last
year, I have tried to get the

10
00:00:58,050 --> 00:01:02,940
classified version of the UFO or
UAP report that was released

11
00:01:02,940 --> 00:01:07,560
last year to the public, the
classified version reviewed and

12
00:01:07,560 --> 00:01:11,790
released to the public. That
process has taken until this

13
00:01:11,790 --> 00:01:16,080
week, to complete excited to say
that I actually got the

14
00:01:16,080 --> 00:01:20,700
declassified version, although
heavily redacted. It is still

15
00:01:20,730 --> 00:01:26,670
incredibly important. So what I
am going to do today is dissect

16
00:01:26,670 --> 00:01:30,210
it for you guys. We're going to
do like I called it a deep dive.

17
00:01:30,300 --> 00:01:33,060
I know these aren't for
everyone. But we're going to go

18
00:01:33,060 --> 00:01:36,720
through it page by page and
compare it to the public version

19
00:01:36,930 --> 00:01:40,620
that we saw last year. There's a
lot of differences. There's a

20
00:01:40,620 --> 00:01:44,910
lot of redactions, as I already
noted, and even those redactions

21
00:01:45,060 --> 00:01:50,130
tell a story. So if you haven't
seen those news stories, that's

22
00:01:50,130 --> 00:01:53,520
a quick overview of what is
going on, and what we are going

23
00:01:53,520 --> 00:01:56,880
to be doing on this particular
episode. Now, as you can see

24
00:01:56,880 --> 00:01:59,970
here, I brought up some visuals.
For those who aren't aware, if

25
00:01:59,970 --> 00:02:04,560
you are listening to the audio
version, I do drop these down to

26
00:02:04,590 --> 00:02:10,230
audio podcasts on every major
audio podcast platform, under

27
00:02:10,230 --> 00:02:13,830
the black vault radio. Some of
you may be just listening to

28
00:02:13,830 --> 00:02:18,660
that, and not realizing that I
do visual presentations as well.

29
00:02:18,780 --> 00:02:21,330
If you're interested in seeing
the visuals that I'm going to

30
00:02:21,330 --> 00:02:25,410
often reference through this, go
to www dot the black

31
00:02:25,410 --> 00:02:32,880
vault.com/live That will take
you to the YouTube channel, you

32
00:02:32,880 --> 00:02:36,600
can go ahead and search for the
video there. And make sure you

33
00:02:36,630 --> 00:02:40,890
like and subscribe, because that
is a huge help on the channel. I

34
00:02:40,890 --> 00:02:43,440
know it sounds simplistic, and I
beat the dead horse with it

35
00:02:43,440 --> 00:02:47,430
every episode. But it really
does help the channel grow. So

36
00:02:47,430 --> 00:02:51,660
thank you, we are now over
50,000 subscribers strong here

37
00:02:51,660 --> 00:02:55,200
and in the last week. Thank you
to those who have decided to

38
00:02:55,200 --> 00:02:57,720
subscribe, I'm guessing a lot of
you that are watching this right

39
00:02:57,720 --> 00:03:01,530
now may be new to the channel.
So what you are about to watch

40
00:03:01,530 --> 00:03:04,590
is what this channel is all
about dissecting the evidence.

41
00:03:04,620 --> 00:03:08,640
Sometimes videos are longer,
sometimes they're shorter. But

42
00:03:08,640 --> 00:03:11,340
regardless, it's about the
evidence. And that's what we're

43
00:03:11,340 --> 00:03:15,720
going to be diving into. So let
me go ahead and start with the

44
00:03:15,720 --> 00:03:19,290
PowerPoint presentation here.
What I want to start with for

45
00:03:19,290 --> 00:03:22,140
those who are either taking
notes or just want a little bit

46
00:03:22,140 --> 00:03:27,330
of background on how I did this,
a lot of news outlets

47
00:03:27,540 --> 00:03:29,970
erroneously mentioned the
Freedom of Information Act. And

48
00:03:29,970 --> 00:03:33,930
although that is what I am known
for this particular case was not

49
00:03:34,200 --> 00:03:37,110
that it was through a process
called a mandatory

50
00:03:37,110 --> 00:03:41,010
declassification review, very
much echoes a Freedom of

51
00:03:41,010 --> 00:03:44,190
Information Act request,
essentially you're requesting a

52
00:03:44,190 --> 00:03:49,800
review of a classified document
or classified material for

53
00:03:49,800 --> 00:03:54,990
public release. And so that is
essentially what we are looking

54
00:03:54,990 --> 00:03:59,220
at here. And that is the result
of that MDR request. Now usually

55
00:03:59,220 --> 00:04:03,210
don't do this, but I decided to
make the entire process public

56
00:04:03,240 --> 00:04:06,390
when it comes to this particular
case. I did it for a couple

57
00:04:06,390 --> 00:04:10,350
different reasons. I did it to
number one, show the agency the

58
00:04:10,380 --> 00:04:14,880
interest that the general public
had in watching this unfold, and

59
00:04:14,880 --> 00:04:17,670
that was palpable with the
different posts and how many

60
00:04:17,670 --> 00:04:21,570
people were watching and looking
at it and so on, but also to

61
00:04:21,570 --> 00:04:26,640
show everybody what that process
is. And what I was surprised

62
00:04:26,640 --> 00:04:30,270
that was how long it took when I
originally undertook this. I was

63
00:04:30,270 --> 00:04:32,310
under the impression that I
would likely get something

64
00:04:32,310 --> 00:04:35,430
within about six weeks, six to
eight weeks. And that's what I

65
00:04:35,430 --> 00:04:39,330
posted out there. Of course,
nothing ever follows through

66
00:04:39,330 --> 00:04:42,180
when it comes to the US
government. So those estimates

67
00:04:42,180 --> 00:04:45,840
really kind of fell to the
wayside. My follow ups through

68
00:04:45,840 --> 00:04:50,700
this process lasted up until
literally the beginning of this

69
00:04:50,700 --> 00:04:53,250
week. I was unaware that they
were going to complete the case

70
00:04:53,250 --> 00:04:57,090
this week. And they numbered
well into the double digits. So

71
00:04:57,090 --> 00:05:00,360
I was trying to not annoy them
to death, but many Have those

72
00:05:00,360 --> 00:05:03,900
follow ups that I would send
would just go unanswered. And I

73
00:05:03,900 --> 00:05:06,870
ended up following a filing an
appeal last

74
00:05:08,189 --> 00:05:11,759
last month, maybe two months
ago, to try and get this

75
00:05:11,969 --> 00:05:15,329
expedited. That appeal was
rejected. I actually couldn't

76
00:05:15,329 --> 00:05:18,989
file the appeal until a full
calendar year had passed from

77
00:05:18,989 --> 00:05:20,999
the filing because I was
appealing the time it was

78
00:05:20,999 --> 00:05:24,389
taking. So I learned learn that
part of the process the hard

79
00:05:24,389 --> 00:05:29,609
way. But regardless, I was able
to maybe show them Hey, once

80
00:05:29,789 --> 00:05:33,029
June rolled around, which was
the year mark, I was going to

81
00:05:33,029 --> 00:05:37,829
file that appeal in hopes to get
this declassified. So that I

82
00:05:37,829 --> 00:05:41,399
think, maybe as a speculation,
but maybe jump started the

83
00:05:41,399 --> 00:05:46,589
process a little bit. But the
agency surprisingly responded

84
00:05:47,129 --> 00:05:50,309
this week. And so my follow up
where I had no idea I'd be

85
00:05:50,309 --> 00:05:54,449
getting it, that follow up was
met with hate good news. It's in

86
00:05:54,449 --> 00:05:59,039
the mail. And so I practically
begged through a telephone call,

87
00:05:59,039 --> 00:06:00,659
I called the Office of the
Director of National

88
00:06:00,659 --> 00:06:03,659
Intelligence. And I said, Look,
I've been very eagerly awaiting

89
00:06:03,659 --> 00:06:06,539
this, is there any possible way
you can send it electronically.

90
00:06:06,809 --> 00:06:09,599
And the rest is history, I was
able to do that. And special

91
00:06:09,599 --> 00:06:12,329
thanks to that agency, because
even though it was a little bit

92
00:06:12,329 --> 00:06:16,769
of a frustrating process, they
were really kind of meeting me

93
00:06:16,769 --> 00:06:19,979
halfway. And they went and
scanned it and sent it to me

94
00:06:19,979 --> 00:06:25,439
yesterday. So thanks to them.
for that. I want to talk before

95
00:06:25,439 --> 00:06:28,559
we deep dive into the document
itself, a controversy that's re

96
00:06:28,559 --> 00:06:33,059
erupted here, in this last cut
in these last couple of days.

97
00:06:33,059 --> 00:06:37,379
And this week, since I published
this document, obviously, it has

98
00:06:37,379 --> 00:06:40,259
gotten a lot of traction. Now,
if you're new to this channel,

99
00:06:40,259 --> 00:06:43,019
you may not be aware, but
through the last, you know,

100
00:06:43,019 --> 00:06:46,259
eight months or so, there has
been a lot of controversy about

101
00:06:46,259 --> 00:06:51,359
how big the classified report
was. That was given to Congress.

102
00:06:51,689 --> 00:06:56,909
And there's been a lot of of
speculation, we'll call it that

103
00:06:56,909 --> 00:07:03,359
some of the estimates were 74
pages, 70 pages, 78 pages, 400

104
00:07:03,359 --> 00:07:08,039
pages, all from people that were
either claiming firsthand

105
00:07:08,039 --> 00:07:13,259
knowledge, or that they had
impeccable, anonymous sources.

106
00:07:13,499 --> 00:07:16,439
And when I wrote the story last
year, where although I didn't

107
00:07:16,439 --> 00:07:19,499
publish the report, because I
didn't have it yet, my legal

108
00:07:19,499 --> 00:07:24,359
case had had progressed to the
point where I learned it was a

109
00:07:24,359 --> 00:07:31,169
17 page document. It was July 16
of last year where I published a

110
00:07:31,169 --> 00:07:37,169
small story that the classified
version was 17 pages. I felt

111
00:07:37,169 --> 00:07:40,919
that was newsworthy, simply
because there were so many

112
00:07:41,099 --> 00:07:44,879
numbers that were being thrown
around. Now, just so you guys

113
00:07:44,879 --> 00:07:49,739
are aware. And before I get to
Jimmy's interview this here, let

114
00:07:49,739 --> 00:07:54,599
me get the pen here so I can
point 74 pages came from Mr.

115
00:07:54,599 --> 00:07:58,229
Luis Elizondo, out of all of the
sources I'm about to mention, I

116
00:07:58,229 --> 00:08:01,289
would say he is probably the
most well connected. I have no

117
00:08:01,469 --> 00:08:04,979
doubts that he maintains a lot
of connections that he has

118
00:08:04,979 --> 00:08:08,489
talked about. And I thought if
anybody was right, it was going

119
00:08:08,489 --> 00:08:13,409
to be him. So when I got the 17
page return, I was a little

120
00:08:13,469 --> 00:08:16,019
surprised. I'm going to come
back to Luis Elizondo in a

121
00:08:16,019 --> 00:08:21,269
moment. The 400 Page estimate
came from his attorney, Daniel

122
00:08:21,269 --> 00:08:25,679
Sheehan. Daniel said that on
fade to black with Jimmy church,

123
00:08:25,709 --> 00:08:29,579
I'll pull up the transcript for
you in a moment, because that

124
00:08:29,579 --> 00:08:32,489
really added a lot more
confusion to this process as

125
00:08:32,489 --> 00:08:40,739
well. 70 pages was let me see
Bob McGuire, he claims to also

126
00:08:40,739 --> 00:08:44,039
have impeccable anonymous
sources. I believe this was on

127
00:08:44,279 --> 00:08:48,239
spaced out radio. And in between
some of the segments that was

128
00:08:48,239 --> 00:08:52,739
broadcast on YouTube. He seemed
very animated, and very

129
00:08:52,949 --> 00:09:00,149
enthusiastic that it was 70
pages. 78 pages came from. Let

130
00:09:00,149 --> 00:09:05,099
me see here. I believe it was
Tim McMillan on another

131
00:09:05,099 --> 00:09:09,539
interview roundtable discussion.
He works for the debrief. So

132
00:09:09,539 --> 00:09:11,879
there were a lot of different
page counts that were being

133
00:09:11,879 --> 00:09:16,259
floated around here. So when I
got 17 pages, I thought okay,

134
00:09:16,559 --> 00:09:20,279
what's going on here? The reason
I wanted to go back to Luis

135
00:09:20,279 --> 00:09:24,629
Elizondo is I've been accused of
not reaching out to him and only

136
00:09:24,629 --> 00:09:29,669
trying to attack him, yet again,
those allegations are false. So

137
00:09:29,669 --> 00:09:34,079
just to clear up the record.
Last July, I did reach out to

138
00:09:34,079 --> 00:09:40,499
Luis Elizondo, and wanted to
explore this discrepancy. I

139
00:09:40,499 --> 00:09:44,939
invited him to add whatever he
wanted to add. Sadly, I was

140
00:09:46,320 --> 00:09:51,180
talking to his PR people at the
time, even though I was speaking

141
00:09:51,180 --> 00:09:54,900
to Mr. Elizondo as well through
through other means. It was his

142
00:09:54,900 --> 00:09:58,500
PR people that kind of take the
took the helm to respond to my

143
00:09:58,500 --> 00:10:03,000
request. And I said To speed up
the story, he didn't want to put

144
00:10:03,000 --> 00:10:06,600
anything on the record. So I
respected that and I moved on.

145
00:10:06,750 --> 00:10:08,760
So just to clear up those
allegations, which are

146
00:10:08,760 --> 00:10:12,780
circulating social media that I
never went to Mr. Elizondo to

147
00:10:12,960 --> 00:10:17,580
clear this up. I did. And he
chose not to respond. I didn't

148
00:10:17,580 --> 00:10:21,840
make a big deal out of it. But
since I'm being accused of so

149
00:10:21,840 --> 00:10:26,460
much from the haters nowadays,
here in the last few days, about

150
00:10:26,460 --> 00:10:29,700
this controversy, hey, let me
clear it up. Right now. I did do

151
00:10:29,700 --> 00:10:33,690
my due diligence. No one will go
on the record with me. And to

152
00:10:33,690 --> 00:10:36,930
add even more confusion, Mr.
Elizondo is attorney Daniel

153
00:10:36,930 --> 00:10:42,330
Sheehan, as I said, said that it
was over 400 pages you can see

154
00:10:42,660 --> 00:10:45,960
in the transcript here on
YouTube during his interview,

155
00:10:46,200 --> 00:10:51,120
that it was over 400. Jimmy
church is a great interviewer,

156
00:10:51,120 --> 00:10:55,680
he asked some great questions,
he brought up the 70, page 78

157
00:10:55,680 --> 00:11:02,130
Page number here, and you can
see the response from Danny

158
00:11:02,130 --> 00:11:07,530
Sheehan, that it was a myth that
it was part of the mythology. In

159
00:11:07,560 --> 00:11:11,220
in you follow G that has arisen?
Again, this is part of that

160
00:11:11,400 --> 00:11:14,100
confusion. So I wanted to bring
that up and kind of address the

161
00:11:14,100 --> 00:11:19,110
controversy that I welcome
anybody with any knowledge of

162
00:11:19,110 --> 00:11:22,410
this to come forward? Some of
you may be eye rolling right

163
00:11:22,410 --> 00:11:25,200
now, why does it matter the
length of the report? Well,

164
00:11:25,200 --> 00:11:28,410
you're absolutely right. But
sadly, there's a lot of people

165
00:11:28,410 --> 00:11:33,210
coming after me accusing the
agency of lying, or accusing me

166
00:11:33,240 --> 00:11:38,250
of working with the agency to
circulate something that isn't

167
00:11:38,250 --> 00:11:43,170
true. That's all internet legend
and lore. And since some

168
00:11:43,200 --> 00:11:44,940
influential accounts are kind of

169
00:11:46,380 --> 00:11:49,350
circulating that I thought that
I would go ahead and address it

170
00:11:49,350 --> 00:11:52,890
here on this deep dive. Moving
on from the from the

171
00:11:52,890 --> 00:11:56,070
controversy, because again, it
is a 17 page document if you

172
00:11:56,070 --> 00:12:00,330
haven't caught on yet. So that
reporting last year was 100%

173
00:12:00,330 --> 00:12:03,840
Spot on. And nobody has brought
evidence to refute that. But the

174
00:12:03,840 --> 00:12:08,310
invitations open if they ever
do. I want to deal with the

175
00:12:08,310 --> 00:12:12,480
exemptions. First, those
redactions when under either the

176
00:12:12,480 --> 00:12:16,680
Freedom of Information Act or an
MDR, when things are redacted.

177
00:12:17,160 --> 00:12:21,120
What happens is they have to
cite the redaction. And what I

178
00:12:21,120 --> 00:12:24,540
mean by that is that they have
to justify them removing

179
00:12:24,570 --> 00:12:27,360
information. So in the FOIA
world, you guys have probably

180
00:12:27,360 --> 00:12:30,660
heard me talk about B one, which
is national security related

181
00:12:30,660 --> 00:12:33,990
information, or B six, which is
personally identifying

182
00:12:33,990 --> 00:12:36,990
information, there's nine total.
But those are some of the more

183
00:12:36,990 --> 00:12:41,670
common ones in the process of an
MDR. It works the exact same

184
00:12:41,670 --> 00:12:45,120
way. But you don't see the same
exemptions. You see other ones,

185
00:12:45,330 --> 00:12:48,060
most of them are going to be
tied to an executive order,

186
00:12:48,630 --> 00:12:53,760
which specifically is 135 to
six, that was kind of the going

187
00:12:53,790 --> 00:12:58,140
or is the going standard for
these types of declassification

188
00:12:58,140 --> 00:13:03,540
reviews and what should remain
exempted. You'll also see some

189
00:13:03,540 --> 00:13:06,930
some other references as well.
But I want to kind of keep it as

190
00:13:06,930 --> 00:13:10,380
simple as I can because it can
get pretty confusing. So from

191
00:13:10,380 --> 00:13:14,610
that letter that I had showed
you the release letter, the ODNI

192
00:13:14,730 --> 00:13:18,660
will reference what they are
redacting and kind of summarize

193
00:13:18,660 --> 00:13:24,930
it all for you. What the ODNI
said was that they were citing

194
00:13:25,170 --> 00:13:30,480
United States Code. Let me see
here, chapter 50, section 3024,

195
00:13:30,840 --> 00:13:33,390
which is information pertaining
to intelligence sources and

196
00:13:33,390 --> 00:13:36,960
methods. And the National
Security Act of 1947, as

197
00:13:36,960 --> 00:13:43,410
amended, also, the chapter 50,
section 3605, which protects

198
00:13:43,440 --> 00:13:46,890
against disclosure of NSA
functions, and information. This

199
00:13:46,890 --> 00:13:50,370
is probably, you know, some of
the maybe spying some of the

200
00:13:50,370 --> 00:13:53,460
decoding of messages, some of
the intelligence gathering

201
00:13:53,460 --> 00:13:56,970
around the world. That's what
the NSA does. And so the

202
00:13:56,970 --> 00:13:59,430
information that they're
bringing in which may touch the

203
00:13:59,430 --> 00:14:02,730
UAP topic, and be in this
report, they're going to go

204
00:14:02,730 --> 00:14:05,910
ahead and exempt it to you to
break it down even farther,

205
00:14:05,940 --> 00:14:15,360
executive order 13526. They
cited for a C, D and G, AC, D

206
00:14:15,360 --> 00:14:19,800
and G Yes, sorry, I get myself
Tongue Tied for different

207
00:14:19,800 --> 00:14:22,530
reasons. In fact, there's
actually five in the document

208
00:14:22,530 --> 00:14:25,500
itself, so they messed up, they
didn't cite one. But regardless,

209
00:14:25,620 --> 00:14:28,380
we'll kind of touch back on this
as we go through the document.

210
00:14:29,130 --> 00:14:33,990
That's section 1.4. A pertains
to military plans, weapon

211
00:14:33,990 --> 00:14:38,130
systems or operations, C
pertains to intelligence active

212
00:14:38,160 --> 00:14:41,640
activities, including covert
action, intelligence sources and

213
00:14:41,640 --> 00:14:46,050
methods or cryptology D pertains
to foreign relations or foreign

214
00:14:46,050 --> 00:14:50,490
activities of the US, including
confidential sources, and G

215
00:14:50,610 --> 00:14:54,180
vulnerabilities are capabilities
of systems installations,

216
00:14:54,420 --> 00:14:58,230
infrastructures projects, plans
or protection services related

217
00:14:58,230 --> 00:15:02,070
to national security. The fifth
that I saw mentioned in the

218
00:15:02,070 --> 00:15:05,940
report, which was not in their
letter, was he scientific,

219
00:15:05,940 --> 00:15:09,810
technical, technological or
economic matters related to

220
00:15:09,810 --> 00:15:14,130
national security? So we'll
revisit that as we go through

221
00:15:14,130 --> 00:15:18,330
the documents. Because, you
know, that may seem dry and

222
00:15:18,360 --> 00:15:21,780
boring is hacking. Why is John
doing this? Well, it's for two

223
00:15:21,780 --> 00:15:24,600
reasons. One, it is a deep dive.
So we're really kind of

224
00:15:24,600 --> 00:15:27,630
dissecting this all together.
But number two, why those

225
00:15:27,630 --> 00:15:29,850
exemptions are important is when
you go through a document, you

226
00:15:29,850 --> 00:15:33,420
can start to fill in the holes a
little bit, even though it's a

227
00:15:33,420 --> 00:15:38,490
black line. Those exemption
citations allow you to figure

228
00:15:38,490 --> 00:15:44,100
out exactly what or why they are
redacting something. And so that

229
00:15:44,100 --> 00:15:50,580
really helps. They also cite
section 6.2 general provisions

230
00:15:50,610 --> 00:15:52,920
of the executive order, I'm only
going to read this once, I won't

231
00:15:52,920 --> 00:15:57,360
touch it again, because I don't
even understand it. But it is

232
00:15:57,360 --> 00:15:58,860
cited in the document a few
times.

233
00:15:59,880 --> 00:16:02,130
Let me read it to you. Nothing
in this order limits the

234
00:16:02,130 --> 00:16:05,040
protection afforded any
information by other provisions

235
00:16:05,070 --> 00:16:07,500
of law, including the
Constitution, Freedom of

236
00:16:07,500 --> 00:16:11,040
Information Act exemptions, the
Privacy Act of 1974, and the

237
00:16:11,040 --> 00:16:14,970
National Security Act of 1947.
As amended, this order is not

238
00:16:14,970 --> 00:16:18,210
intended to and does not create
any right or benefit,

239
00:16:18,480 --> 00:16:22,560
substantive or procedural
enforceable at law by a party

240
00:16:22,560 --> 00:16:25,710
against the United States, its
departments, agencies or

241
00:16:25,710 --> 00:16:28,980
entities, its officers,
employees, or agents or any

242
00:16:28,980 --> 00:16:32,820
other person. The foregoing is,
in addition to the specific

243
00:16:32,820 --> 00:16:38,760
provisions set forth in sections
1.1, B, 3.1, C, and 5.3 of this

244
00:16:38,760 --> 00:16:40,800
order, don't worry, I ain't
going to go back to it because I

245
00:16:40,800 --> 00:16:44,040
don't care too. But I wanted to
read it for you, at least for

246
00:16:44,040 --> 00:16:47,100
the audio version, but also, to
just kind of tell you guys, they

247
00:16:47,100 --> 00:16:51,030
cite that as well. But to be
honest with you, I just don't, I

248
00:16:51,060 --> 00:16:53,940
really just don't get it,
there's really kind of no reason

249
00:16:53,940 --> 00:16:57,720
because the other exemptions
pretty much make sense. So let's

250
00:16:57,720 --> 00:17:03,000
start going through the 17
pages. What I've done here is on

251
00:17:03,000 --> 00:17:06,600
the left side of your screen
here on the display, if you're

252
00:17:06,600 --> 00:17:10,380
watching this, it's going to be
the classified newly released

253
00:17:10,500 --> 00:17:15,450
version. On the right side
labeled public report, I split

254
00:17:15,450 --> 00:17:18,960
up every single page of that
report to coincide with the

255
00:17:18,960 --> 00:17:22,920
classified version. That way,
you can visually see how they

256
00:17:22,920 --> 00:17:27,270
took the classified version, and
then truncated it to death,

257
00:17:28,410 --> 00:17:33,480
dropping roughly about half of
it, and making the public

258
00:17:33,480 --> 00:17:37,020
version. So I kind of line up
the sections and you'll also see

259
00:17:37,020 --> 00:17:40,050
some minor word changes, I'm not
going to go over all of those

260
00:17:40,050 --> 00:17:44,640
because it's it's just kind of
pointless. Obviously, they had a

261
00:17:44,640 --> 00:17:48,570
working version and then likely,
you know, polished it up a

262
00:17:48,570 --> 00:17:52,710
little bit for the public. But
the classified version in some

263
00:17:52,710 --> 00:17:55,560
areas is just worded a little
differently. I will point out

264
00:17:55,560 --> 00:17:57,900
one or two but just know you may
find some of those slight

265
00:17:57,900 --> 00:18:00,900
changes that I don't reference.
That's why it's just kind of

266
00:18:00,900 --> 00:18:05,160
irrelevant. But I wanted to show
you the side by side, and how

267
00:18:05,160 --> 00:18:08,070
much more information is
actually revealed here. Even

268
00:18:08,070 --> 00:18:10,440
though there's a lot of
redactions, we can read a lot.

269
00:18:10,440 --> 00:18:15,480
Also, a couple things I'll point
out about the cover page. This

270
00:18:15,480 --> 00:18:22,800
here is the classification. It
is referenced as that section

271
00:18:23,130 --> 00:18:26,610
three, zero to four eye
protection of intelligence

272
00:18:26,610 --> 00:18:30,870
sources and methods. I'm
guessing this is just a guess

273
00:18:30,900 --> 00:18:34,980
that there is a classification
with a code word here. So they

274
00:18:34,980 --> 00:18:38,370
remove the whole thing because
it may reveal again, a type of

275
00:18:38,370 --> 00:18:41,280
program prime examples, if you
look at the National Security

276
00:18:41,280 --> 00:18:45,630
Agency documents on UFOs because
they deal with comment or

277
00:18:45,660 --> 00:18:50,760
communication intelligence, a
lot of them have a rubra you MBR

278
00:18:50,790 --> 00:18:57,180
a code word on it. So it's top
secret slash ombre. For a lot of

279
00:18:57,180 --> 00:19:00,870
years, Uber was a classified
designator and so that was fully

280
00:19:00,870 --> 00:19:05,100
redacted. Over years of
fighting, I filed MDR requests

281
00:19:05,100 --> 00:19:09,750
to the NSA very much like I did
here and got a lot of those

282
00:19:09,750 --> 00:19:14,190
documents rereleased with Uber
revealed. That's what I think is

283
00:19:14,190 --> 00:19:17,520
going on here. Again, that part
is a little bit of speculation.

284
00:19:18,240 --> 00:19:21,270
But I That's That's why these
redactions are there, you'll see

285
00:19:21,270 --> 00:19:24,300
them every single page.
juxtapose that with the public

286
00:19:24,300 --> 00:19:28,200
report. Unclassified designator,
obviously not redacted for any

287
00:19:28,200 --> 00:19:33,570
reason, classified by that's
going to be a person and

288
00:19:34,920 --> 00:19:37,380
protection of intelligence
sources and method again is

289
00:19:37,380 --> 00:19:42,300
three zero to four. But when you
go down here, you're talking

290
00:19:42,300 --> 00:19:47,130
about the subsection that
protects identities derived from

291
00:19:47,130 --> 00:19:50,700
they also are classifying that
if I were to guess this is the

292
00:19:50,700 --> 00:19:55,020
UAP security classification
guide that was released last

293
00:19:55,020 --> 00:19:59,580
year to me that I published the
reason I say that as UAP related

294
00:19:59,580 --> 00:20:02,490
documents often cite that
security classification guide

295
00:20:02,880 --> 00:20:06,660
ODNI may not have realized it
was released already. And so

296
00:20:06,660 --> 00:20:10,920
they redacted the reference to
it. I will be appealing a lot of

297
00:20:10,920 --> 00:20:14,160
these redactions, when I'm
recording this. I'm still

298
00:20:14,160 --> 00:20:17,700
stewing in my brain how I'm
going to address some of it. But

299
00:20:17,700 --> 00:20:21,150
just so you know, that's on my
on my agenda is to appeal appeal

300
00:20:21,150 --> 00:20:24,570
redactions like this to see
what's under there declassify

301
00:20:24,570 --> 00:20:30,780
on, generally, that's 30 plus
years into the future. And they

302
00:20:30,780 --> 00:20:33,960
redacted that date for whatever
reason. But anyway, just a quick

303
00:20:33,960 --> 00:20:39,960
rundown of what you're seeing
there. Here is page two, the

304
00:20:39,960 --> 00:20:42,780
scoping assumptions, you'll see
it's very, very similar to the

305
00:20:42,780 --> 00:20:45,960
public report. But there's one
thing that I want to hone in on.

306
00:20:45,990 --> 00:20:49,110
And so I'm gonna just go into
one paragraph here, this was the

307
00:20:49,110 --> 00:20:53,670
difference. First thing to know
1.4 C, right, that's from the

308
00:20:53,670 --> 00:20:57,600
executive order 135 to six
intelligence activities,

309
00:20:57,600 --> 00:21:00,360
including covert action,
intelligence sources or methods

310
00:21:00,390 --> 00:21:04,950
or cryptology. Now, we know that
the NSA is already referenced

311
00:21:04,950 --> 00:21:08,520
here. So it's not them. There's
speculation on whether or not it

312
00:21:08,520 --> 00:21:12,180
is the CIA, a lot of people are
making guesses online.

313
00:21:12,390 --> 00:21:15,240
Regardless, this is an agency
that was not in the public

314
00:21:15,240 --> 00:21:18,540
report, and that they don't want
to tell you about. So again,

315
00:21:18,540 --> 00:21:22,050
whether or not that's the CIA or
someone else who knows, just

316
00:21:22,050 --> 00:21:26,100
speculation, but I found it
pretty fascinating that they do

317
00:21:26,100 --> 00:21:29,610
have input from another agency
that they don't want to tell you

318
00:21:29,610 --> 00:21:32,610
about. Another interesting
difference, which may have just

319
00:21:32,610 --> 00:21:35,400
been an oversight, was the
classified version had the

320
00:21:35,400 --> 00:21:40,710
Marine Corps in it. And also
NASA. Now, if you're watching

321
00:21:40,710 --> 00:21:43,320
this channel in the past, you'll
know that I've discovered some

322
00:21:43,320 --> 00:21:47,370
of those NASA briefings, which
likely was the UAP taskforce

323
00:21:47,370 --> 00:21:50,460
reaching out to NASA sharing
information, and then

324
00:21:50,460 --> 00:21:55,890
ultimately, NASA contributing to
the report. Where's NASA? Down

325
00:21:55,890 --> 00:22:00,120
here in the public report, their
reference was removed? Was it a

326
00:22:00,120 --> 00:22:03,630
mistake and oversight? I'll let
you guys decide. But those are

327
00:22:03,630 --> 00:22:07,620
two clear differences. The
Office of Naval Intelligence,

328
00:22:07,620 --> 00:22:09,660
which is essentially where the
UAP task force was

329
00:22:09,660 --> 00:22:14,070
headquartered, was listed in the
public report. But nowhere to be

330
00:22:14,070 --> 00:22:17,880
found in the classified report.
That's minor, again, probably

331
00:22:17,880 --> 00:22:21,360
just an oversight. But something
I wanted to at least know two

332
00:22:21,390 --> 00:22:25,800
navies, their navies there on on
both versions, but Navy Oh, and

333
00:22:25,800 --> 00:22:30,870
I is not, again, just kind of a
kind of one of those things that

334
00:22:30,900 --> 00:22:34,440
you got to point out, but who
knows why. Digging into the

335
00:22:34,440 --> 00:22:40,140
executive summary. The executive
summary totals one page, just to

336
00:22:40,140 --> 00:22:43,170
kind of dispel another myth that
a lot of people talk about, they

337
00:22:43,170 --> 00:22:48,150
feel that the executive summary
in total was 17 pages, and the

338
00:22:48,150 --> 00:22:51,300
classified version was much,
much longer. That is also

339
00:22:51,330 --> 00:22:55,080
untrue. The executive summary
was a one page summary of the

340
00:22:55,080 --> 00:22:58,380
entire report. And then as
you'll see, as we go on are the

341
00:22:58,380 --> 00:23:03,240
different sections there of the
one minor difference here was in

342
00:23:03,240 --> 00:23:06,210
this paragraph, in a limited
number of incidents, UAP

343
00:23:06,210 --> 00:23:09,510
reportedly appeared to exhibit
unusual flight characteristics.

344
00:23:10,770 --> 00:23:14,250
The public version put a period
there, the classified version

345
00:23:14,250 --> 00:23:17,490
goes into more detail saying
including several in which the

346
00:23:17,700 --> 00:23:22,200
and then we got some blackout
line there, involving and then

347
00:23:22,200 --> 00:23:27,780
yet again, all blacked out the
citations, AE and G, military

348
00:23:27,780 --> 00:23:30,600
plans, weapon systems
operations, scientific,

349
00:23:30,600 --> 00:23:34,500
technological or economic
matters, and vulnerabilities or

350
00:23:34,500 --> 00:23:37,410
capabilities of systems. So
obviously, they are going into

351
00:23:37,410 --> 00:23:41,160
detail about their, their
capability here or lack there of

352
00:23:41,400 --> 00:23:45,180
within military operations,
public didn't get to see that.

353
00:23:45,360 --> 00:23:48,510
Obviously, we don't get to see
all of it. But we get a glimpse

354
00:23:48,510 --> 00:23:51,600
that they have more to tell
about this phenomena.

355
00:23:52,980 --> 00:23:55,590
Now we're getting into pages
that have a lot more information

356
00:23:55,620 --> 00:23:59,430
available reporting, largely
inconclusive public version said

357
00:23:59,430 --> 00:24:04,080
the same thing broke down the
cases 144 of these reports at

358
00:24:04,530 --> 00:24:08,460
involved observation with
multiple sensors. But when you

359
00:24:08,460 --> 00:24:12,420
look at over here on the
classified version just

360
00:24:12,420 --> 00:24:15,180
released, after carefully
considering this information,

361
00:24:15,210 --> 00:24:22,590
the UAP TF focused on a data set
of blank, probably describing

362
00:24:22,980 --> 00:24:27,750
blank, those blanks being
redacted. This is the one

363
00:24:27,750 --> 00:24:30,930
difference here that I'm going
to point out that is is kind of

364
00:24:30,930 --> 00:24:35,220
a minor word change. But I think
very, very interesting to see

365
00:24:35,220 --> 00:24:39,030
how they tell the public one
thing, but also tell Congress

366
00:24:39,570 --> 00:24:43,260
the same thing, but in my
opinion, has a much different

367
00:24:43,260 --> 00:24:49,470
tone to it. The public version
first, we were able to identify

368
00:24:49,470 --> 00:24:53,520
one report, one reported UAP
with high confidence in that

369
00:24:53,520 --> 00:24:56,700
case, we identified the object
as a large deflating balloon.

370
00:24:57,810 --> 00:25:03,510
The version Congress Got in only
one instance, the UAP, TF was

371
00:25:03,510 --> 00:25:06,900
able to identify the reported
UAP with high confidence. In

372
00:25:06,900 --> 00:25:09,930
that case, we identified the
object of a large deflating

373
00:25:09,930 --> 00:25:14,730
balloon, the others remain
unexplained. This is just a

374
00:25:14,730 --> 00:25:18,750
personal opinion. But I see that
as a much softer way to say it

375
00:25:18,750 --> 00:25:21,870
to the public, and a much more
negative way to say it to

376
00:25:21,870 --> 00:25:25,920
Congress meaning and only one,
like only one, we were able to

377
00:25:25,920 --> 00:25:28,920
do this where the public said,
Hey, we were able to do this.

378
00:25:29,190 --> 00:25:32,070
You know, for me, I'd see a tone
difference. I know, I'm just

379
00:25:32,070 --> 00:25:35,220
reading it. But for me, I read
the tone difference. Again, I'm

380
00:25:35,220 --> 00:25:38,190
not going to do that a lot here
in this presentation. But I did

381
00:25:38,190 --> 00:25:41,160
want to notate that because I
feel that there's very much a

382
00:25:41,160 --> 00:25:44,700
different message by saying the
same thing, but very much a

383
00:25:44,700 --> 00:25:48,780
different tone to that message.
In the classified version, you

384
00:25:48,780 --> 00:25:52,350
get down to again, the breakdown
of the reports. You'll see here

385
00:25:52,350 --> 00:25:55,650
that in the classified version
of these ad reports involve

386
00:25:55,680 --> 00:25:58,560
observations with multiple
sensors, public version had a

387
00:25:58,560 --> 00:26:05,220
period there, the expansion says
including and redacted. And, and

388
00:26:05,220 --> 00:26:10,080
then more redactions, the
remaining blank redaction

389
00:26:10,320 --> 00:26:14,760
observed incidents were captured
by and then redacted again, see

390
00:26:14,760 --> 00:26:17,460
tables one and two, put a pin in
the tables one and two, because

391
00:26:17,460 --> 00:26:22,560
we're going to get to those. But
the area here when you talk

392
00:26:22,560 --> 00:26:24,990
about military plans, weapon
systems and operations, the

393
00:26:24,990 --> 00:26:28,140
citation here under a we're
obviously getting to the

394
00:26:28,140 --> 00:26:34,290
capabilities of our military. So
some of those redactions, I

395
00:26:34,290 --> 00:26:37,290
would say, are acceptable.
That's the reason why redactions

396
00:26:37,290 --> 00:26:40,230
are there. It's frustrating, and
even laughable when you try and

397
00:26:40,230 --> 00:26:43,230
read it out loud. But when you
look at it, you kind of start to

398
00:26:43,230 --> 00:26:45,990
understand where they're talking
about our weapon systems

399
00:26:45,990 --> 00:26:49,830
capabilities, our detection
capabilities, so on, as you read

400
00:26:49,830 --> 00:26:53,700
through this, and those I would
say are acceptable. But not all

401
00:26:53,700 --> 00:26:59,430
are and will will, we're now
getting into that section. In

402
00:26:59,430 --> 00:27:03,360
the classified version, not in
the public of the 144. US

403
00:27:03,360 --> 00:27:07,650
government reports. We don't
know how many originated from

404
00:27:07,680 --> 00:27:12,240
because it's redacted originated
from Navy range. Fowler reports,

405
00:27:12,240 --> 00:27:15,660
which provide basic information,
such as the time, date,

406
00:27:15,660 --> 00:27:18,180
location, description, and what
occurred during the event.

407
00:27:18,810 --> 00:27:23,040
Again, a redacted number reports
were from a combination of Air

408
00:27:23,040 --> 00:27:29,190
Force, Marine Corps, Coast Guard
and other agencies. So again, it

409
00:27:29,190 --> 00:27:31,710
was that they had the Marine
Corps that wasn't mentioned in

410
00:27:31,710 --> 00:27:34,770
the public version, but they
were in the classified version.

411
00:27:34,920 --> 00:27:38,190
Well, this is probably why,
because we now know that there

412
00:27:38,190 --> 00:27:41,220
are Marine Corps incidents. And
yes, I have filed request to

413
00:27:41,220 --> 00:27:45,270
them for what those incidents
may be. Why did they shield that

414
00:27:45,270 --> 00:27:49,380
from the US public, I don't
know, in the public version. But

415
00:27:49,380 --> 00:27:55,440
regardless, they did only an a
redacted number of the 144

416
00:27:55,440 --> 00:28:00,840
reports contained, and then
redacted A and G which again,

417
00:28:00,840 --> 00:28:05,100
military plans, weapon systems
or operations, and then

418
00:28:08,880 --> 00:28:13,050
G that I had in my notes,
vulnerabilities or capabilities

419
00:28:13,050 --> 00:28:16,080
of systems installations, so the
vulnerabilities are going to be

420
00:28:16,080 --> 00:28:19,950
G. So I have a cheat sheet on
all of those breakdowns here

421
00:28:19,950 --> 00:28:22,950
too. I thought I had it on the
screen, but I did not. So

422
00:28:22,950 --> 00:28:25,320
anyway, you could see how kind
of confusing this gets. But it

423
00:28:25,320 --> 00:28:30,810
starts to get into capabilities
of UAP and our lack of ability

424
00:28:30,810 --> 00:28:35,580
to either detect or or track or
chase or identify what these

425
00:28:35,580 --> 00:28:39,600
are. You'll see here, a lot more
redaction, not in the public

426
00:28:39,600 --> 00:28:42,750
report. Although these reports a
bunch of redaction the

427
00:28:42,750 --> 00:28:46,200
description of unknown targets,
bunch of redaction, that's all

428
00:28:46,200 --> 00:28:49,350
see intelligence activities.
That's the exemption

429
00:28:49,350 --> 00:28:51,570
intelligence activities
including covert action

430
00:28:51,570 --> 00:28:55,380
intelligence sources or methods.
You'll see down here is the

431
00:28:55,980 --> 00:29:01,620
definition of a range Fowler.
That's referred to up here and

432
00:29:01,620 --> 00:29:04,170
then there's a footnote citation
not sure if you can see that on

433
00:29:04,170 --> 00:29:09,810
your screen. But it says US
Navy, US Navy aviators to find a

434
00:29:09,810 --> 00:29:13,350
range Fowler as an activity or
object that interrupts pre

435
00:29:13,350 --> 00:29:16,650
planned training, or other
military activity in a military

436
00:29:16,650 --> 00:29:22,800
operating area, or restricted
airspace. Moving on, you can see

437
00:29:22,800 --> 00:29:25,680
how this kind of chunks together
with the public report but

438
00:29:25,680 --> 00:29:31,020
expanded and the UAP collection
challenges. This really gets

439
00:29:31,020 --> 00:29:35,040
into our capability. So the
redactions are understandable.

440
00:29:35,850 --> 00:29:38,490
Here's something in the
classified version. The sensors

441
00:29:38,490 --> 00:29:41,880
mounted on US military platforms
are typically designed to

442
00:29:41,880 --> 00:29:47,370
fulfill specific missions often
redacted. As a result, those

443
00:29:47,370 --> 00:29:51,600
sensors are not generally suited
for identifying UAP which can be

444
00:29:52,110 --> 00:29:57,210
and then redacted. These are
starting to get interesting

445
00:29:57,210 --> 00:30:02,010
because again, although some are
understanding doubly done that

446
00:30:02,010 --> 00:30:06,030
meaning that redactions, others
are not. And it's the capability

447
00:30:06,030 --> 00:30:10,950
of UAP. But it kind of is a gray
area where it also when we

448
00:30:10,950 --> 00:30:18,570
reveal the capability of UAP,
sadly, it will reveal our lack

449
00:30:18,570 --> 00:30:22,680
of ability to either detect,
track, identify, and so on. And

450
00:30:22,680 --> 00:30:26,700
so then, you know, for me, I'm
mad at that redaction, but can

451
00:30:26,700 --> 00:30:29,820
kind of understand it jumping
down here, but some potential

452
00:30:29,820 --> 00:30:33,810
patterns do emerge, we can see a
very similar paragraph here. But

453
00:30:33,810 --> 00:30:37,440
below that more information. And
this, I believe, is what

454
00:30:37,440 --> 00:30:41,790
resonated most with the general
public when it came to what was

455
00:30:41,790 --> 00:30:46,050
redacted. Let me read to you
what was revealed the most

456
00:30:46,050 --> 00:30:48,630
common shape described by
military personnel and their

457
00:30:48,630 --> 00:30:54,090
reporting was a redacted. See
figure one. So we'll get to

458
00:30:54,090 --> 00:30:57,360
figure one with the tables in a
moment. military aviators

459
00:30:57,360 --> 00:31:04,470
describe many of these redacted
objects as redacted or redacted,

460
00:31:04,620 --> 00:31:11,460
that redacted several sightings
were redacted and resembled

461
00:31:11,940 --> 00:31:19,140
redacted shapes, like a redacted
or a redacted. Alright, so

462
00:31:19,140 --> 00:31:25,290
here's the frustration, why are
shapes redacted? I don't get it,

463
00:31:25,650 --> 00:31:28,890
to be honest with you. But that
is the reality behind what we're

464
00:31:28,890 --> 00:31:33,960
looking at, I will be appealing
this at length as well. I do not

465
00:31:33,960 --> 00:31:39,120
believe the shape of something
would be classified. I don't see

466
00:31:39,120 --> 00:31:42,450
a justification for it. There's
no identifying markers. There is

467
00:31:42,450 --> 00:31:46,170
no attribution to any country,
military branch foreign or

468
00:31:46,170 --> 00:31:49,920
domestic? Nothing. So there's no
connection there that would

469
00:31:49,920 --> 00:31:53,070
reveal sources and methods,
nothing that would reveal

470
00:31:53,100 --> 00:31:57,510
anything of a classified nature.
So why are they withholding the

471
00:31:57,510 --> 00:32:02,460
shapes? This to me was one of
the more intriguing aspects to

472
00:32:02,460 --> 00:32:06,630
this release, why the physical
characteristics of something?

473
00:32:06,870 --> 00:32:11,400
Why is that something that they
cannot reveal? The citation is

474
00:32:11,400 --> 00:32:15,240
mostly a here, which are
military plans, weapon systems

475
00:32:15,240 --> 00:32:21,150
or operations. One may argue
that it fits into descriptions

476
00:32:21,150 --> 00:32:25,230
of our own technology. But let
me dispel that myth at this

477
00:32:25,230 --> 00:32:30,510
point. You'll see later as well,
they could not attribute any of

478
00:32:30,510 --> 00:32:34,830
the cases that they investigated
to classified domestic

479
00:32:34,860 --> 00:32:38,790
technology. So why again, are
the shapes classified?

480
00:32:40,230 --> 00:32:43,650
This here, let me see here
continues the section we were

481
00:32:43,650 --> 00:32:49,920
just on. Let me continue reading
observed UAP usually traveled

482
00:32:49,920 --> 00:32:55,470
between redacted and redacted.
So likely speeds are being

483
00:32:55,470 --> 00:32:58,920
redacted their altitudes varied
for these objects, but

484
00:32:58,920 --> 00:33:03,510
frequently registered between
redacted and redacted. So

485
00:33:03,510 --> 00:33:08,490
obviously, the altitude numbers
as well redacted mean sea level

486
00:33:08,520 --> 00:33:12,450
so frequently registered between
blank and blank mean sea level

487
00:33:12,450 --> 00:33:16,830
or MSL, we have a redacted
number of cases however, in

488
00:33:16,830 --> 00:33:20,760
which the observer perceived
that the UAP demonstrated

489
00:33:21,090 --> 00:33:25,950
redacted and another in which
the UAP was detected. redacted,

490
00:33:25,980 --> 00:33:30,720
feet MSL so obviously redacting
another altitude here, which I

491
00:33:30,720 --> 00:33:34,950
am going to argue in the appeal
should not be read, should not

492
00:33:34,950 --> 00:33:39,840
be concealed, but rather
revealed. Reason being we know

493
00:33:39,900 --> 00:33:43,170
our capabilities, it's public
knowledge that we can determine

494
00:33:43,170 --> 00:33:47,520
altitudes of tracks that we see
with our equipment. That is not

495
00:33:47,520 --> 00:33:51,000
revealing any classified
information. So why don't they

496
00:33:51,000 --> 00:33:55,260
want to tell us that UAP are
flying between this height and

497
00:33:55,260 --> 00:33:59,790
that height? I don't know. There
may be some military strategy to

498
00:33:59,790 --> 00:34:04,110
withhold that or military reason
for national security. Okay, I

499
00:34:04,110 --> 00:34:07,680
just personally don't see it.
Feel free to comment below if

500
00:34:07,680 --> 00:34:10,950
you'd like. You may disagree
with me, and that's fine. I just

501
00:34:10,950 --> 00:34:15,420
feel that it's not blowing any
secret, as their citation is a

502
00:34:15,420 --> 00:34:22,110
military plans, weapon systems
or operations. I just don't see

503
00:34:22,110 --> 00:34:26,490
it. Moving on to the section and
a handful of UAP appear to

504
00:34:26,490 --> 00:34:31,890
demonstrate advanced technology
and 18 incidents described in 21

505
00:34:31,890 --> 00:34:36,540
reports, observers reported
unusual UAP movement patterns or

506
00:34:37,350 --> 00:34:40,980
flight characteristics public
version, put a period there and

507
00:34:40,980 --> 00:34:47,460
the classified version and or
redacted. A few of these reports

508
00:34:47,460 --> 00:34:53,340
describe UAP behavior, and then
a lot more reaction. Some UAP

509
00:34:53,340 --> 00:34:56,760
appear to remain stationary and
winds aloft move against the

510
00:34:56,760 --> 00:35:01,740
wind maneuver abruptly or move
it considered speed without

511
00:35:01,740 --> 00:35:05,640
discernible means of propulsion.
And a small number of cases

512
00:35:05,640 --> 00:35:09,300
military aircraft systems
processed radio frequency energy

513
00:35:09,510 --> 00:35:13,740
associated with UAP sightings,
public version put a period

514
00:35:13,740 --> 00:35:19,710
there, classified version as
redacted, although there are

515
00:35:20,370 --> 00:35:26,520
redacted. We would redacted
recordings of radar displays

516
00:35:26,550 --> 00:35:31,770
suggest these UAP a couple more
redacted lines. Citations were

517
00:35:31,800 --> 00:35:35,730
GE vulnerabilities or
capabilities of systems

518
00:35:35,730 --> 00:35:38,730
installations or infrastructure.
So obviously what the UAP are

519
00:35:38,730 --> 00:35:43,020
doing, we are unable to do what
we need to do with tracking to

520
00:35:43,080 --> 00:35:47,280
track and identify them.
justifiable redaction. I'll let

521
00:35:47,280 --> 00:35:53,220
you guys decide. Next paragraph
in redacted a night a Navy pilot

522
00:35:53,250 --> 00:35:59,220
in a redacted lines in altitude.
He noted the winds aloft were

523
00:35:59,220 --> 00:36:03,450
greater than redacted and he was
fighting to keep his aircraft in

524
00:36:03,450 --> 00:36:09,420
the airspace redacted was
redacted and its position was

525
00:36:09,420 --> 00:36:14,280
unaffected by the redacted what
could be there? Is it kind of

526
00:36:14,280 --> 00:36:20,010
interesting, unaffected by what
the pilot redacted line object

527
00:36:20,010 --> 00:36:24,780
was redacted. So let me just
dissect that for a moment. It's

528
00:36:24,780 --> 00:36:29,400
saying that the Navy pilot was
in wins, greater than but they

529
00:36:29,400 --> 00:36:33,750
wouldn't tell us how great and
that he was, quote, fighting to

530
00:36:33,750 --> 00:36:36,480
keep his aircraft in the
airspace. That's an exact quote

531
00:36:36,870 --> 00:36:41,130
in the document, which means it
was a quote from the witness.

532
00:36:41,670 --> 00:36:44,910
But it seems when you read the
redacted lines that the UAP

533
00:36:44,910 --> 00:36:49,680
whatever that was, was
unaffected. By the I mean, when

534
00:36:49,920 --> 00:36:54,690
did we shoot at it unaffected by
what radar jamming? It's a very

535
00:36:54,690 --> 00:36:58,410
small redaction. It's right here
position was unaffected by the

536
00:36:58,740 --> 00:37:02,370
mean, it looks like you could
probably only fit what 3456

537
00:37:02,370 --> 00:37:06,420
Maybe six characters there. So
if it was wins, why would you

538
00:37:06,420 --> 00:37:10,650
redact it? I'm not really sure
the citation is a in G military

539
00:37:10,650 --> 00:37:14,430
plans, weapon systems or
operations, G vulnerabilities or

540
00:37:14,430 --> 00:37:15,210
capabilities.

541
00:37:15,240 --> 00:37:19,770
So what's there that's another
one of those ones that really

542
00:37:19,770 --> 00:37:23,280
doesn't make sense. Other ones
do and they're obvious other

543
00:37:23,280 --> 00:37:28,200
ones do not moving on in
redacted a navy report

544
00:37:28,200 --> 00:37:32,430
documented, redacted, but then
appear to change course and

545
00:37:32,430 --> 00:37:37,110
speed. redacted from redacted.
These are longer redactions they

546
00:37:37,110 --> 00:37:41,610
don't look like like speed and
numbers, maybe. But it just

547
00:37:41,640 --> 00:37:44,850
looks a little bit longer.
Regardless, you can see here

548
00:37:44,850 --> 00:37:49,890
obviously, intelligently
controlled. So not a balloon,

549
00:37:50,490 --> 00:37:55,020
you know, not not a trash bag
flying in the wind. Drone, you

550
00:37:55,020 --> 00:37:58,200
know, of course maybe. But
regardless, you are seeing

551
00:37:58,200 --> 00:38:00,870
intelligently controlled craft
that are being encountered. So

552
00:38:00,870 --> 00:38:05,790
just punching that point, moving
on in blank are redacted a UAP

553
00:38:05,790 --> 00:38:12,810
exhibited redacted according to
redacted the UAP TF has a

554
00:38:12,840 --> 00:38:16,230
redacted number additional
reports of aircraft indicating

555
00:38:16,650 --> 00:38:22,170
redacted that appear to
redacted. I'm giving you these

556
00:38:22,170 --> 00:38:25,890
kind of rough readings. Again,
not only for the audio version,

557
00:38:27,060 --> 00:38:31,620
but to see how how some of this
just doesn't make sense that

558
00:38:31,620 --> 00:38:34,710
we're not we should not be
encroaching on classified

559
00:38:34,710 --> 00:38:38,490
information here that we should
be able to talk about the

560
00:38:38,490 --> 00:38:41,820
characteristics of what they are
seeing when we talk about

561
00:38:41,820 --> 00:38:45,300
vulnerabilities okay, I mean, I
can understand that, but some of

562
00:38:45,300 --> 00:38:50,250
these characteristics in my
opinion should not be redacted.

563
00:38:52,650 --> 00:38:58,770
Moving on to this last paragraph
before we turn the page the UAP

564
00:38:58,770 --> 00:39:01,470
TF holds a small amount of data
that appear to show you AP

565
00:39:01,470 --> 00:39:06,210
demonstrating acceleration or
degree of signature management,

566
00:39:07,050 --> 00:39:10,530
public version, put a period
there redacted version, excuse

567
00:39:10,530 --> 00:39:13,260
me classified version comes in
with some redacted lines.

568
00:39:13,560 --> 00:39:17,490
However, this and then another
redacted line and then it goes

569
00:39:17,490 --> 00:39:23,100
on from there according to
redacted during a redacted

570
00:39:23,100 --> 00:39:27,810
incident, the UAP what kind of
like what is what is the

571
00:39:27,810 --> 00:39:32,190
descriptor here, which doesn't
make sense, but again, redacted.

572
00:39:32,820 --> 00:39:39,090
So during a whatever redaction
here incident the UAP from the

573
00:39:39,090 --> 00:39:46,710
aircraft, redacted, shows the
object redacted. A 2004 UAP

574
00:39:46,710 --> 00:39:51,540
event reportedly demonstrated
redacted 2004 I think we can all

575
00:39:51,540 --> 00:39:54,420
safely assume that that is the
Nimitz encounter. So they're

576
00:39:54,420 --> 00:39:57,180
dealing with a couple different
incidents here kind of giving a

577
00:39:57,180 --> 00:40:00,600
summation of them and the
characteristics of us up and

578
00:40:00,600 --> 00:40:05,040
potentially our vulnerabilities.
Moving on, according to US Navy

579
00:40:05,040 --> 00:40:11,790
reporting, during redacted hours
in redacted a helicopter pilot.

580
00:40:11,820 --> 00:40:15,180
Now that's new, a helicopter
pilot and two weapon systems

581
00:40:15,180 --> 00:40:19,740
officers or Ws O's or Windows,
visually observed several,

582
00:40:20,250 --> 00:40:25,500
several key word redacted
several what redacted objects

583
00:40:25,500 --> 00:40:29,700
moving approximately and
redacted. One of the windows

584
00:40:29,790 --> 00:40:37,830
redacted approximately redacted
five redacted objects, which

585
00:40:38,310 --> 00:40:45,870
redacted the widow reported he
redacted but redacted. The pilot

586
00:40:45,870 --> 00:40:52,110
and the other WIZO redacted, the
redacted objects. So now we've

587
00:40:52,170 --> 00:40:57,660
Okay, so let's dissect this. As
silly as that just read 555 What

588
00:40:57,660 --> 00:41:00,060
objects not really sure, but
there are five objects.

589
00:41:00,480 --> 00:41:03,060
Obviously, it's mentioned here,
can we safely deduce that those

590
00:41:03,060 --> 00:41:06,960
are the UAP that were
encountered. So five UAP objects

591
00:41:06,960 --> 00:41:10,860
of some kind, I think that may
be a safe assumption. It was a

592
00:41:10,860 --> 00:41:13,470
helicopter pilot. So there's not
many of those around, we keep

593
00:41:13,470 --> 00:41:17,790
hearing about the F 18
encounters over the years, but

594
00:41:18,510 --> 00:41:22,320
not a helicopter. So that
seemingly is a new case or not

595
00:41:22,320 --> 00:41:25,680
one that's ringing a bell for
me. And then talks about what

596
00:41:25,680 --> 00:41:29,160
the weapon system officers, they
were doing something but

597
00:41:29,160 --> 00:41:34,230
essentially nothing was was
working. So when you read that,

598
00:41:34,260 --> 00:41:37,470
as silly as it sounds, read
between the lines, so to speak,

599
00:41:37,650 --> 00:41:40,170
and you can start seeing some
some interesting encounters be

600
00:41:40,170 --> 00:41:40,740
revealed.

601
00:41:42,210 --> 00:41:44,910
Moving on to the next section,
you can see here juxtaposing the

602
00:41:44,910 --> 00:41:47,940
public report with the
classified UAP probably lack a

603
00:41:47,940 --> 00:41:52,830
single explanation that's,
that's a given. And so I was I

604
00:41:52,830 --> 00:41:55,770
was glad to see that in there.
But you'll see here it comes in

605
00:41:55,770 --> 00:41:59,130
with in the classified version,
numerous paragraphs, full

606
00:41:59,130 --> 00:42:04,530
paragraphs, fully redacted. The
citations were military plans,

607
00:42:04,530 --> 00:42:07,770
weapon systems or operations,
intelligence activities,

608
00:42:07,770 --> 00:42:13,830
including covert action or
sources of methods, and D. I'm

609
00:42:13,830 --> 00:42:17,250
sorry, G vulnerabilities or
capability. So it's pretty much

610
00:42:17,250 --> 00:42:22,740
like everything that is being
cited here. And that is broken

611
00:42:22,740 --> 00:42:26,580
down in two different paragraphs
but fully redacted. Now we're

612
00:42:26,580 --> 00:42:29,130
getting into the explanations,
the breakdown of the

613
00:42:29,130 --> 00:42:34,620
explanations about UAP are these
are essentially the categories

614
00:42:34,650 --> 00:42:36,840
right? What where do they fit
not everything is, you know,

615
00:42:38,580 --> 00:42:42,660
unknown for good, so they
brought a list of the possible

616
00:42:42,660 --> 00:42:48,450
explanations. In the public
report, it was reflected as

617
00:42:48,450 --> 00:42:52,470
well, airborne clutter. These
objects include birds, balloons,

618
00:42:52,470 --> 00:42:56,520
recreational unmanned aerial
vehicles, UAVs, or airborne

619
00:42:56,520 --> 00:43:00,510
debris, like plastic bags that
that muddle a scene and affect

620
00:43:00,510 --> 00:43:03,900
an operator's ability to
identify true targets such as

621
00:43:03,900 --> 00:43:07,920
enemy aircraft, public version,
put a period there, the

622
00:43:07,920 --> 00:43:12,480
classified version expanded on
airborne clutter. This category

623
00:43:12,480 --> 00:43:16,740
can also include an a bunch of
redactions, we recognize that

624
00:43:16,770 --> 00:43:22,770
bunch of redaction with the and
the rest is redacted. Not sure

625
00:43:22,770 --> 00:43:25,830
what they can redact on airborne
clutter, but there you have it.

626
00:43:27,150 --> 00:43:30,450
The next paragraph also under
airborne clutter, we have

627
00:43:30,450 --> 00:43:37,050
examples of pilots who stated
that they redacted. G would be

628
00:43:37,050 --> 00:43:40,230
which is the citation on these
redactions, vulnerabilities or

629
00:43:40,230 --> 00:43:44,280
capabilities of systems. Okay,
maybe maybe somehow that's

630
00:43:44,280 --> 00:43:49,860
justifiable, but I just found it
silly. The next category natural

631
00:43:49,860 --> 00:43:53,910
atmospheric phenomena. Natural
atmospheric phenomena includes

632
00:43:53,940 --> 00:43:56,790
ice crystals, moisture and
thermal fluctuations that may

633
00:43:56,790 --> 00:44:01,320
register on some infrared and
radar systems public report put

634
00:44:01,320 --> 00:44:04,890
a period their classified report
gave another line and a half,

635
00:44:05,040 --> 00:44:11,130
all redacted. Underneath that
was a really bizarre deletion

636
00:44:11,130 --> 00:44:17,490
from the public version, which
was released in the classified

637
00:44:17,490 --> 00:44:23,430
version. Under natural
atmospheric phenomena, although

638
00:44:23,430 --> 00:44:27,600
we cannot definitively classify
any UAP occurrences in our data

639
00:44:27,600 --> 00:44:31,320
set as caused by atmospheric
phenomena, we also cannot rule

640
00:44:31,320 --> 00:44:34,650
out the possibility that these
factors may account for some of

641
00:44:34,650 --> 00:44:37,950
what pilots have observed. Well,
of course, it could account for

642
00:44:37,950 --> 00:44:42,090
some that's why it's there. But
still, the key part here is that

643
00:44:42,090 --> 00:44:47,220
you could not identify one, not
a single one. So is that

644
00:44:47,250 --> 00:44:52,020
vulnerabilities or your what is
it? Yeah, vulnerabilities or

645
00:44:52,020 --> 00:44:55,980
capabilities of your system or
lack of capabilities? Maybe, but

646
00:44:55,980 --> 00:44:59,160
why would you need to take that
out of the report? The public

647
00:44:59,160 --> 00:45:02,190
version, not really sure,
interesting nonetheless, that

648
00:45:02,190 --> 00:45:06,210
that was taken out. Next reason
US government or industry

649
00:45:06,210 --> 00:45:09,960
developmental programs, some UAP
observations could be

650
00:45:09,960 --> 00:45:13,710
attributable to classified US
government airspace programs, or

651
00:45:13,710 --> 00:45:17,910
systems under development by
commercial aerospace, aerospace

652
00:45:17,910 --> 00:45:23,760
firms. We were unable to
confirm, however, that these

653
00:45:23,760 --> 00:45:29,190
systems accounted for any of the
UAP reports. We collected public

654
00:45:29,190 --> 00:45:32,700
version, put a period there
classified version goes on, we

655
00:45:32,700 --> 00:45:33,570
have

656
00:45:35,190 --> 00:45:39,570
and then insert four and a half
redacted lines we have what if

657
00:45:39,570 --> 00:45:43,560
they couldn't, if they couldn't
confirm anything as being

658
00:45:44,580 --> 00:45:48,060
classified tech or something
like that? What extra

659
00:45:48,060 --> 00:45:50,280
information did the classified
version have that we're not

660
00:45:50,280 --> 00:45:54,330
seeing? Not really sure. Next
reason for an adversary systems.

661
00:45:54,570 --> 00:45:57,300
A lot of people talked about
this, especially in Congress

662
00:45:57,300 --> 00:46:00,390
that they some were saying they
thought that that's what it was,

663
00:46:00,660 --> 00:46:07,530
when it came to UAPs. Other UAP
other said that it was not China

664
00:46:07,530 --> 00:46:11,820
or Russia. So what is it a lot
of speculation there. But within

665
00:46:11,820 --> 00:46:14,790
the report, foreign adversary
systems, some UAP, maybe

666
00:46:14,790 --> 00:46:17,730
intelligent collection platforms
developed by China, Russia,

667
00:46:17,940 --> 00:46:21,990
another nation or non
governmental entity, public

668
00:46:21,990 --> 00:46:24,960
version, put a period their
classified version went on, they

669
00:46:24,960 --> 00:46:31,140
could also be a a, what redacted
lines worth of redaction

670
00:46:31,170 --> 00:46:35,730
although, and then a couple more
redacted lines. In addition, we

671
00:46:35,730 --> 00:46:39,060
add a few more redacted lines
after that. So they definitely

672
00:46:39,060 --> 00:46:43,560
expand this, this this section.
But we don't know why. We have

673
00:46:43,560 --> 00:46:47,490
no idea why. Even though it
doesn't say it here later in the

674
00:46:47,490 --> 00:46:49,650
report, and I'll get to that in
a moment. But later in the

675
00:46:49,650 --> 00:46:52,380
report, it does say that not a
single incident, they were able

676
00:46:52,380 --> 00:46:57,120
to connect to any foreign
adversary system. So obviously,

677
00:46:57,120 --> 00:47:01,110
that is something that although
they tried to do, were unable to

678
00:47:01,110 --> 00:47:07,950
do it, and then going going on
the other category. The other

679
00:47:07,950 --> 00:47:13,080
category remained exactly the
same. UAP threatened flight

680
00:47:13,080 --> 00:47:17,400
safety and possibly national
security. That section here was

681
00:47:17,400 --> 00:47:21,150
expanded ongoing airspace
concerns. We have in the

682
00:47:21,150 --> 00:47:23,340
classified version, we have
documented flight safety

683
00:47:23,340 --> 00:47:27,330
concerns and insert a couple of
redacted lines there. And then

684
00:47:27,330 --> 00:47:30,480
it goes on to what was in the
the public report. When aviators

685
00:47:30,480 --> 00:47:33,900
encounter safety hazards. They
are required to report these

686
00:47:33,900 --> 00:47:37,320
concerns. Towards the end of the
paragraph, you'll see some some

687
00:47:37,320 --> 00:47:41,850
extra information, primarily all
redacted. Next paragraph, same

688
00:47:41,850 --> 00:47:46,500
deal in and then redacted. A
pilot briefly observed a couple

689
00:47:46,500 --> 00:47:51,750
of redacted lines, however a and
then redacted. What it's showing

690
00:47:51,750 --> 00:47:54,570
here is that Congress, the
Senate, they were getting

691
00:47:54,600 --> 00:47:58,860
additional information about the
cases. And what what was going

692
00:47:58,860 --> 00:48:02,520
on the fact that they didn't
change that a lot of the

693
00:48:02,520 --> 00:48:06,540
categories and explanations
existed, you know, the mundane

694
00:48:06,570 --> 00:48:10,680
explanations, they still
couldn't fit anything into those

695
00:48:10,680 --> 00:48:13,620
categories. So what are they
redacting? Here? What are they?

696
00:48:13,860 --> 00:48:16,140
Again, it could just be
vulnerabilities, and that's

697
00:48:16,140 --> 00:48:19,890
fine. But why aren't they
telling us what exactly these

698
00:48:19,890 --> 00:48:23,700
pilots were observing what is so
classified about that? Because

699
00:48:23,700 --> 00:48:27,210
they can't fit it into any
category? If it was a Russian

700
00:48:27,540 --> 00:48:31,560
technology, drone technology,
classified technology, we were

701
00:48:31,560 --> 00:48:34,590
seeing it with classified
systems. Okay, maybe some of

702
00:48:34,590 --> 00:48:38,730
that is justifiable, but again,
they say none of that was was

703
00:48:38,730 --> 00:48:42,480
doable, they were not able to
connect any foreign adversary to

704
00:48:42,480 --> 00:48:47,430
the 143 remaining cases. Why is
it really just our

705
00:48:47,430 --> 00:48:51,540
vulnerability, I would really
hope not. Next section,

706
00:48:51,540 --> 00:48:54,960
potential national security
challenges. You see up top here,

707
00:48:55,020 --> 00:48:58,620
definitely identical, or near
identical to the public report,

708
00:48:59,130 --> 00:49:04,230
followed by a pretty big, full
paragraph, fully redacted.

709
00:49:04,980 --> 00:49:08,130
intelligence activities,
intelligence sources and methods

710
00:49:08,520 --> 00:49:11,640
and vulnerabilities or
capabilities of systems all

711
00:49:11,640 --> 00:49:18,000
cited here, and all removed.
Explaining UAP will require

712
00:49:18,000 --> 00:49:21,150
analytic collection and resource
investments section, top of

713
00:49:21,150 --> 00:49:24,300
which pretty much echoes the
public version. We have an extra

714
00:49:24,300 --> 00:49:28,590
paragraph here given the
redacted the UAP. TF also plans

715
00:49:28,590 --> 00:49:32,160
to explore how best to leverage
the capabilities of non DoD

716
00:49:32,160 --> 00:49:35,370
departments and agencies to
enable effective and efficient

717
00:49:35,370 --> 00:49:40,680
transfer of data and redacted
among the DoD redacted and the

718
00:49:40,680 --> 00:49:43,860
law enforcement community. So
obviously here, I'm not really

719
00:49:43,860 --> 00:49:47,220
sure, citation intelligence
activities, intelligence sources

720
00:49:47,220 --> 00:49:52,560
and methods and cryptology. I
don't understand where the the,

721
00:49:53,220 --> 00:49:56,070
the sharing of information is
something that they wanted to

722
00:49:56,070 --> 00:50:00,000
omit from the public version,
maybe some of the systems that

723
00:50:00,000 --> 00:50:02,340
They utilize I can understand
that explain some of these

724
00:50:02,340 --> 00:50:05,880
redactions. But why they want
that removed the coordination,

725
00:50:05,910 --> 00:50:06,870
not really sure.

726
00:50:08,340 --> 00:50:11,670
Moving on the expand collection
section, you'll see again, top

727
00:50:11,670 --> 00:50:15,300
is very reminiscent to the
public report underneath that

728
00:50:15,330 --> 00:50:19,290
big fat, black square, all
redacted. So definitely some

729
00:50:19,290 --> 00:50:22,740
expanding of the collection. And
just to remind you what that

730
00:50:22,980 --> 00:50:25,830
said, the UAP tf is looking for
novel ways to increase

731
00:50:25,830 --> 00:50:29,730
collection of UAP cluster areas,
when US forces are not present

732
00:50:29,730 --> 00:50:33,540
as a way to baseline standard
UAP activity and mitigate

733
00:50:33,540 --> 00:50:36,660
collection bias in the data set.
So essentially, if they're only

734
00:50:36,660 --> 00:50:40,830
collecting data from military
installations, it's going to be

735
00:50:40,830 --> 00:50:43,410
a bias towards military
installations, because that's

736
00:50:43,410 --> 00:50:46,170
all they look at. So they're
trying to set up ways to collect

737
00:50:46,170 --> 00:50:49,500
information that was in the
public report. What's down here,

738
00:50:49,680 --> 00:50:54,210
obviously, was not. Here's
another one for you FOIA people

739
00:50:54,210 --> 00:50:58,140
out there. Some of you may find
it, briefly. Interesting. But

740
00:50:58,140 --> 00:51:01,530
the FOIA people this is what you
look for, increase investment in

741
00:51:01,530 --> 00:51:05,580
research and development. public
version have the same paragraph

742
00:51:05,580 --> 00:51:09,090
with one difference. The UAP TF
has indicated that additional

743
00:51:09,090 --> 00:51:11,790
funding for research and
development could further the

744
00:51:11,790 --> 00:51:15,990
mission objectives defined by a
Deputy Secretary of Defense

745
00:51:15,990 --> 00:51:21,810
Action Memo 23 July 2020. Such
investments should be guided by

746
00:51:21,810 --> 00:51:26,730
a UAP collection strategy UAP
r&d Technical roadmap and a UAP

747
00:51:26,730 --> 00:51:31,200
program guide. This highlighted
section here that memo had never

748
00:51:31,230 --> 00:51:35,220
has never and has yet to be
released to the public, nor was

749
00:51:35,220 --> 00:51:38,490
it even known. And so this is
the kind of stuff that was

750
00:51:38,490 --> 00:51:42,060
removed in the public version,
which indicates this is likely a

751
00:51:42,060 --> 00:51:46,410
classified likely a classified
memorandum that they did not

752
00:51:46,410 --> 00:51:51,030
want out into the public. My
case with ODNI brought its

753
00:51:51,060 --> 00:51:54,150
existence out to the public.
I've already filed a case for

754
00:51:54,150 --> 00:51:57,420
this, we'll see if it's
declassified. I'm hopeful it is.

755
00:51:57,630 --> 00:52:00,120
It's possible if it is a
classified memo, it was

756
00:52:00,120 --> 00:52:04,200
classified because at the time
it was written. The UAP research

757
00:52:04,230 --> 00:52:08,880
effort or the task force may
have been a classified topic at

758
00:52:08,880 --> 00:52:12,660
the time later, it was obviously
revealed. But that is something

759
00:52:12,660 --> 00:52:16,200
that for again, the FOIA people
out there, you really look for,

760
00:52:16,500 --> 00:52:19,950
for the UAP UFO crowd. That's
just interesting, because

761
00:52:19,950 --> 00:52:24,210
there's more documents,
hopefully to come. Now remember,

762
00:52:24,210 --> 00:52:28,560
I talked about the tables and
some of the pins I told you to

763
00:52:28,560 --> 00:52:31,530
put in while we were talking
about the report, you'll see

764
00:52:31,530 --> 00:52:34,560
nothing here on the public side,
because this is all brand new,

765
00:52:34,560 --> 00:52:38,490
this was just in the classified
version. And it breaks down UAP

766
00:52:38,490 --> 00:52:44,370
reports by this could be pilots.
I mean, again, this is just

767
00:52:44,820 --> 00:52:48,210
purely speculation, but maybe
just you know more of these

768
00:52:48,240 --> 00:52:52,920
pilot category, ground observer
radar tech operator who knows,

769
00:52:53,400 --> 00:52:57,840
but they have what appears to be
four different categories of UFO

770
00:52:57,840 --> 00:53:02,280
observations by maybe sensors is
another one, radar only,

771
00:53:02,850 --> 00:53:05,850
whatever the four categories
are, and then underneath that

772
00:53:05,850 --> 00:53:11,040
are likely the numbers. So
you'll see here the heading in

773
00:53:11,040 --> 00:53:13,830
the table, you see a blue color
there for watching visually,

774
00:53:14,250 --> 00:53:17,790
these are probably again those
categories, this is probably the

775
00:53:17,790 --> 00:53:23,250
number jumping down here UAP
detected by and then it was

776
00:53:23,280 --> 00:53:27,990
redacted unidentified aerial
phenomena, redacted headers here

777
00:53:28,350 --> 00:53:32,640
in over half, over half of the
144 reports from US government

778
00:53:32,640 --> 00:53:38,040
observers, redacted unidentified
aerial phenomena, then a bunch

779
00:53:38,040 --> 00:53:41,670
of redaction. So this could
likely be maybe another table,

780
00:53:42,150 --> 00:53:46,140
the headers classified who
knows, but obviously a lot of

781
00:53:46,140 --> 00:53:51,330
information here they do not
want you to know. Figure one is

782
00:53:51,330 --> 00:53:56,790
likely the most controversial
redaction one that everybody

783
00:53:56,790 --> 00:54:00,120
wants to see I've already
briefly mentioned it well here

784
00:54:00,120 --> 00:54:04,500
is likely a visual breakdown of
the common shapes that are seen

785
00:54:04,530 --> 00:54:07,920
in these cases. So the
unidentified aerial phenomena

786
00:54:07,920 --> 00:54:10,980
head or you can see up here
under the figure one, some

787
00:54:10,980 --> 00:54:14,250
redactions here, observers
frequently described

788
00:54:14,280 --> 00:54:19,980
unidentified aerial phenomena as
likely that that shape, though

789
00:54:20,040 --> 00:54:23,880
and then some redaction here,
such as a and then a bunch of

790
00:54:23,880 --> 00:54:27,810
more redaction shaped objects.
So for whatever reason, yet

791
00:54:27,810 --> 00:54:31,920
again, they do not want these
common shapes revealed, here is

792
00:54:31,920 --> 00:54:35,520
the table where they break that
down. And then the less common

793
00:54:35,520 --> 00:54:40,320
irregular shapes, you can do
that. You know, speculate on

794
00:54:40,320 --> 00:54:43,920
what is there as well. But how I
translate this I was asked by

795
00:54:43,920 --> 00:54:45,660
the hill I got to do an
interview with the hill the

796
00:54:45,660 --> 00:54:50,520
other day, how I how I translate
this, I was a little surprised

797
00:54:50,520 --> 00:54:54,330
by the question. Essentially,
how I translate this to echo the

798
00:54:54,330 --> 00:54:58,170
same definition here. These are
just simply a breakdown of

799
00:54:58,170 --> 00:55:01,890
shapes whether they be drawings,
photos, Are both of the types of

800
00:55:01,890 --> 00:55:04,740
UAP being seen? Are they photos?
Are

801
00:55:04,739 --> 00:55:07,139
they diagrams? Well, there's one
of three possibilities. They're

802
00:55:07,139 --> 00:55:13,139
all photos, or screenshots from
video. They are all diagrams or

803
00:55:13,139 --> 00:55:17,699
sketches or a mixture of both.
If I were to bet $1 Right now, I

804
00:55:17,699 --> 00:55:23,039
would say, a mixture of both.
The less common irregular

805
00:55:23,039 --> 00:55:26,699
shapes, same deal, probably
maybe a one off encounter or

806
00:55:26,699 --> 00:55:29,909
something very, very minimal,
but they wanted to notate it as

807
00:55:29,909 --> 00:55:34,799
well. My guess is it's a mixture
of both. I'm veering away from

808
00:55:34,799 --> 00:55:37,949
the report. This slide is not in
the report. But I wanted to show

809
00:55:37,949 --> 00:55:42,719
you guys an example of what
might be under there. This is a

810
00:55:43,139 --> 00:55:48,869
photograph captured by a Snoopy
team that I believe was from the

811
00:55:48,869 --> 00:55:52,709
USS stout, but I was able to get
this recently declassified and

812
00:55:52,709 --> 00:55:55,859
released. But you'll see here
are photographs that were taken.

813
00:55:56,129 --> 00:56:00,899
This came up in a UAP related
case, you'll see here, this is

814
00:56:00,899 --> 00:56:05,099
an obvious drone. So I'm not
saying that this is anything but

815
00:56:05,279 --> 00:56:10,409
but it goes under a UAP
category. And so would we see

816
00:56:10,409 --> 00:56:13,889
stuff like this under there? I'm
not really sure. But it's it's

817
00:56:13,889 --> 00:56:17,699
possible. You'll also see here
in that particular case, there

818
00:56:17,699 --> 00:56:21,779
was a exempted photograph here,
was it another angle? Was it

819
00:56:21,779 --> 00:56:26,249
another craft? What was it who
knows, but you can see that some

820
00:56:26,279 --> 00:56:30,269
they will share when it comes to
UAP categories, some they will

821
00:56:30,269 --> 00:56:35,639
not. I will use this in my
appeal and my plea for saying

822
00:56:35,639 --> 00:56:41,609
you should not redact shapes and
descriptors. So my argument is

823
00:56:41,639 --> 00:56:45,119
in very short, I mean, it'll be
a much bigger length in the

824
00:56:45,119 --> 00:56:50,219
appeal. But essentially, if you
guys have descriptors,

825
00:56:50,249 --> 00:56:55,259
identification, identifying
markings, something like that a

826
00:56:55,259 --> 00:56:58,559
caption that will connect it to
a classified system, whatever it

827
00:56:58,559 --> 00:57:02,219
might be. Those are acceptable
redactions. However, when it

828
00:57:02,219 --> 00:57:06,929
comes to the shapes, those I do
not believe are justified. And

829
00:57:06,929 --> 00:57:10,079
that is what I'm going to hone
in on and hopefully get maybe

830
00:57:10,079 --> 00:57:13,829
not if there are captions, maybe
not all the captions, but

831
00:57:13,829 --> 00:57:17,339
hopefully the shapes or
something that will reveal what

832
00:57:17,339 --> 00:57:21,359
they are, are photographing, or
videotaping or whatever they may

833
00:57:21,359 --> 00:57:27,209
be. Here's another appendix that
was entirely new. In the

834
00:57:27,209 --> 00:57:29,639
classified version that was
released, obviously, you can see

835
00:57:29,639 --> 00:57:32,909
about 50%, redacted here,
collection by intelligence

836
00:57:32,909 --> 00:57:36,929
discipline. And it breaks down
the way that they collect the

837
00:57:36,929 --> 00:57:41,999
intelligence geospatial
intelligence, or, or, in other

838
00:57:41,999 --> 00:57:45,149
words, information derived from
an analysis of images and data

839
00:57:45,419 --> 00:57:50,219
associated with a particular
location. There's a full agency

840
00:57:50,249 --> 00:57:55,769
that is dedicated to this called
the NGA, not the ngi. A, as many

841
00:57:55,769 --> 00:57:59,129
people reference it, but rather
the NGA, that's the National

842
00:57:59,129 --> 00:58:04,109
Geospatial Intelligence Agency.
Not not an agency that's talked

843
00:58:04,109 --> 00:58:08,339
about a lot. But the NGA
obviously plays a role in this

844
00:58:09,059 --> 00:58:12,839
in this discussion and in these
investigations. And in case

845
00:58:12,839 --> 00:58:15,209
maybe in the live chat right
now, I'm sure somebody is

846
00:58:15,209 --> 00:58:19,049
saying, Hey, have you ever hit
the NGA with requests? Yes, I

847
00:58:19,049 --> 00:58:22,589
have. years ago, it came back
negative when it came to UFO

848
00:58:22,589 --> 00:58:26,369
related information. But given
the information gleaned in this

849
00:58:26,369 --> 00:58:29,699
report, I did file last year
because they did talk about

850
00:58:29,849 --> 00:58:32,939
geospatial intelligence in the
public report as well. They just

851
00:58:32,939 --> 00:58:37,169
didn't have this appendix. You
can also see SIGINT or signals

852
00:58:37,169 --> 00:58:39,359
intelligence is broken down.
That's the intelligence

853
00:58:39,359 --> 00:58:42,629
gathering by the interception of
signals, whether communications

854
00:58:42,629 --> 00:58:47,429
between people or from
electronic signals. They also

855
00:58:47,429 --> 00:58:52,709
use human or human intelligence.
That is intelligence gathered by

856
00:58:52,709 --> 00:58:57,029
means of interpersonal contact,
Massena, int or Mason's

857
00:58:57,239 --> 00:59:01,469
measurement in signals
intelligence. I'm going to read

858
00:59:01,469 --> 00:59:04,679
to the exact Department of
Defense definition for this one.

859
00:59:05,129 --> 00:59:07,349
This is measurement and signal
intelligence. It's the

860
00:59:07,349 --> 00:59:10,079
scientific and technical
intelligence information

861
00:59:10,409 --> 00:59:13,679
obtained by quantitative and
qualitative analysis of data

862
00:59:13,679 --> 00:59:18,419
collected by specific technical
sensors. The data are collected

863
00:59:18,419 --> 00:59:22,169
to identify distinctive features
of the source, emitter or sender

864
00:59:22,319 --> 00:59:25,439
and to facilitate its subsequent
identification and or

865
00:59:25,439 --> 00:59:30,059
measurement. So that is a
breakdown of messenger nascent.

866
00:59:31,679 --> 00:59:32,489
A pet Appendix B

867
00:59:32,490 --> 00:59:36,660
also is brand new, Federal
Bureau of Investigation support

868
00:59:36,690 --> 00:59:40,680
of attribution efforts given the
national security implications

869
00:59:40,680 --> 00:59:44,130
associated with potential
threats posed by UAP, operating

870
00:59:44,340 --> 00:59:47,100
in close proximity to sensitive
military activities,

871
00:59:47,490 --> 00:59:50,790
installations, critical
infrastructure or national

872
00:59:50,820 --> 00:59:54,030
security sites. The FBI is
positioned to use its

873
00:59:54,030 --> 00:59:56,970
investigative capabilities and
authorities to support

874
00:59:56,970 --> 01:00:00,330
deliberate DOD and interagency
efforts to do Sherman

875
01:00:00,360 --> 01:00:04,320
attribution. In other words,
they're calling on the FBI to

876
01:00:04,320 --> 01:00:07,290
help out with this effort,
although they were briefly

877
01:00:07,290 --> 01:00:11,730
mentioned, in the public report
that mentioned was only a line

878
01:00:11,730 --> 01:00:15,990
or two. However, in this
appendix, obviously, you can see

879
01:00:16,020 --> 01:00:20,850
a lot is redacted, but expanded.
So obviously, for an

880
01:00:20,850 --> 01:00:25,050
investigator like me, this gives
me a new target, even though I

881
01:00:25,050 --> 01:00:29,610
already have hit them with FOIA
requests last year, based on

882
01:00:29,610 --> 01:00:33,420
their mention in the report,
this shows me that they have a

883
01:00:33,420 --> 01:00:38,070
much bigger involvement in the
UAP effort, the research effort,

884
01:00:38,550 --> 01:00:42,300
and whether or not that that
continues on after the UAP task

885
01:00:42,300 --> 01:00:46,950
force and this aeoi MSG office
that is seemingly still getting

886
01:00:46,950 --> 01:00:50,250
their feet on the ground, the
FBI is going to be heavily

887
01:00:50,250 --> 01:00:53,400
involved. I'm a little surprised
at that, because there are

888
01:00:53,400 --> 01:00:57,060
investigative arms within the
Navy and within the air force

889
01:00:57,240 --> 01:01:00,600
that can do those types of
investigations. In fact, even

890
01:01:00,600 --> 01:01:03,750
when you're talking about
because the report talked about

891
01:01:03,750 --> 01:01:10,560
it UAVs, commercial UAVs I've
gotten NCIS, the Navy Criminal

892
01:01:10,560 --> 01:01:14,190
Investigative Service, I've
gotten those NCIS reports

893
01:01:14,190 --> 01:01:19,650
investigating a commercial level
drone going into a naval

894
01:01:19,650 --> 01:01:23,640
installation. So I've gotten
those before, not UAP or UFOs,

895
01:01:23,640 --> 01:01:26,220
in the sense that we're talking
about it. But regardless, they

896
01:01:26,220 --> 01:01:31,350
do that type of investigation.
So their involvement of the FBI

897
01:01:31,350 --> 01:01:34,470
was a little bit surprising to
me, but maybe they're expanding

898
01:01:34,500 --> 01:01:37,860
outside the walls of the US
military. And so they have to

899
01:01:37,860 --> 01:01:40,590
get involved a law enforcement
agency like that. So that's

900
01:01:40,590 --> 01:01:44,460
understandable. I was still
surprised nonetheless. Here's a

901
01:01:44,460 --> 01:01:47,490
side by side of the public
report, which in the public

902
01:01:47,490 --> 01:01:51,270
report was Appendix A, in the
classified was Appendix C, the

903
01:01:51,270 --> 01:01:54,990
definition of key terms. Really,
the only difference here was the

904
01:01:54,990 --> 01:01:58,740
inclusion of range Fowler in the
classified version, even though

905
01:01:58,740 --> 01:02:03,480
you can see here, they kept it
as a footnote. Why I'm not sure

906
01:02:03,480 --> 01:02:07,620
I think it was an oversight. But
regardless, there is an addition

907
01:02:08,070 --> 01:02:11,850
of likely another word or
terminology, a key term, if you

908
01:02:11,850 --> 01:02:18,510
will, that is 100% redacted,
from the the word or phrase

909
01:02:18,510 --> 01:02:22,080
itself through the definition,
so completely removed. They're

910
01:02:22,350 --> 01:02:26,670
pretty interesting. Maybe the
the citation is military plans,

911
01:02:26,670 --> 01:02:30,450
weapon systems, or operations
and vulnerabilities or

912
01:02:30,450 --> 01:02:33,600
capabilities of systems. That to
me, it doesn't make sense,

913
01:02:33,690 --> 01:02:36,210
unless they have some kind of
phrasing that talks about their

914
01:02:36,210 --> 01:02:41,760
vulnerability. Not really sure.
So that citation, I'm also

915
01:02:41,760 --> 01:02:45,120
fighting in the appeal. Because
I think the definition of

916
01:02:45,120 --> 01:02:49,020
something shouldn't be
classified. When it comes to

917
01:02:49,230 --> 01:02:52,800
vulnerabilities or military
plans. There are classified

918
01:02:52,800 --> 01:02:55,530
keywords, and there have been in
the past that have been

919
01:02:55,530 --> 01:02:59,400
declassified. But when it comes
to this, it didn't make sense.

920
01:02:59,430 --> 01:03:03,510
So I'm going to fight that as
well. Appendix B in the public

921
01:03:03,510 --> 01:03:07,080
report was Appendix D in the
classified version, this was a

922
01:03:07,080 --> 01:03:10,620
breakdown of the Senate report
accompanying the intelligence

923
01:03:10,620 --> 01:03:15,150
Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2021. Again, was was

924
01:03:15,180 --> 01:03:19,830
identical, no changes there. And
that brings us to the end.

925
01:03:21,389 --> 01:03:23,699
Hopefully, with that deep dive,
it gives you guys an

926
01:03:23,699 --> 01:03:26,219
understanding that even though
it's frustrating at first

927
01:03:26,219 --> 01:03:29,429
glance, you see this
information, you see how much

928
01:03:29,429 --> 01:03:33,779
redaction there is. And it's
frustrating. But very much like

929
01:03:33,779 --> 01:03:38,219
the public report when we got
that, after that frustration

930
01:03:38,219 --> 01:03:40,919
that it was only nine pages with
the public report, and I was

931
01:03:40,919 --> 01:03:43,829
frustrated as well. You walk
away, you take a deep breath,

932
01:03:43,829 --> 01:03:47,759
you come back, sit down, and you
start digesting the information.

933
01:03:48,329 --> 01:03:51,179
For me if you guys recall from
that video, for those who saw

934
01:03:51,179 --> 01:03:55,379
it, it spawned over 50 Freedom
of Information Act request to

935
01:03:55,379 --> 01:03:58,739
about 13 or 14 different
agencies and military branches.

936
01:03:59,159 --> 01:04:02,099
My point is, is that at first
glance, things can be

937
01:04:02,099 --> 01:04:06,209
frustrating or seemingly
worthless. But when you come

938
01:04:06,209 --> 01:04:11,099
back and really look, you now
have a partial glimpse into what

939
01:04:11,099 --> 01:04:16,559
is being bantered about in
classified material and given to

940
01:04:16,649 --> 01:04:21,839
the Senate and and other members
of the House. And when you

941
01:04:21,839 --> 01:04:25,799
digest that, you realize that
there is much more to the story,

942
01:04:26,219 --> 01:04:30,119
that they are getting much more
to the story, a news channel,

943
01:04:30,629 --> 01:04:33,509
not going to say it now it
should air by the time this

944
01:04:33,509 --> 01:04:38,219
drops, but I'll give it in the
live chat. If it does. I just

945
01:04:38,219 --> 01:04:42,359
never like to talk about it
until it actually airs. So a

946
01:04:42,359 --> 01:04:46,259
newscaster asked me today. What
about the senators that have

947
01:04:46,259 --> 01:04:48,539
come out or congressmen that
have come out and said hey,

948
01:04:48,539 --> 01:04:53,039
there's really a high likelihood
that this is just, you know,

949
01:04:53,039 --> 01:04:56,579
either a classified piece of
technology or or a foreign

950
01:04:56,579 --> 01:04:59,339
adversary and you know,
everybody's kind of going to the

951
01:04:59,339 --> 01:05:03,479
alien route. But my evidence
kind of points elsewhere. Of

952
01:05:03,479 --> 01:05:06,209
course, that's a paraphrased
question and, quote,

953
01:05:06,420 --> 01:05:08,760
but there have been those that
have come out and said that

954
01:05:08,760 --> 01:05:10,890
there's also been those that
have come out and said, No, it's

955
01:05:10,890 --> 01:05:14,760
not that. But regardless, they
had asked me today, hey, what do

956
01:05:14,760 --> 01:05:17,910
you what do you how do you
respond to that. And my response

957
01:05:17,910 --> 01:05:21,990
is simple. And this is the the
value of a document like this,

958
01:05:21,990 --> 01:05:25,290
that even though it is heavily
redacted, it shows you that what

959
01:05:25,320 --> 01:05:29,280
those politicians are saying
that have that angle, that there

960
01:05:29,280 --> 01:05:33,690
is a high likelihood of either a
foreign adversary, or our own

961
01:05:33,690 --> 01:05:39,480
technology, maybe being rumored
about and so on. Not a single

962
01:05:39,510 --> 01:05:43,650
case, in the classified version
was referenced as being either,

963
01:05:44,160 --> 01:05:48,810
not one. Now, there may be
certain logical reasons on why.

964
01:05:49,020 --> 01:05:52,110
But regardless, when you look at
that fact, and you see those

965
01:05:52,110 --> 01:05:56,670
politicians telling you, before
this came out, telling you, it's

966
01:05:56,670 --> 01:05:59,820
a high likelihood of that, but
now we've learned that the

967
01:05:59,820 --> 01:06:04,320
public version did not go into
the level of detail detail that

968
01:06:04,320 --> 01:06:07,500
they got in the classified
version. And in that classified

969
01:06:07,500 --> 01:06:12,690
version, not a single shred of
evidence, will reinforce what

970
01:06:12,690 --> 01:06:16,170
they are saying not not
anything, the military was not

971
01:06:16,170 --> 01:06:21,270
able to peg one foreign
adversarial drone, or piece of

972
01:06:21,300 --> 01:06:26,340
technological technology, or
technological platform to any of

973
01:06:26,340 --> 01:06:30,330
the UAP that were investigated.
In addition, they were not able

974
01:06:30,330 --> 01:06:35,670
to peg one single case, on any
classified piece of us

975
01:06:35,670 --> 01:06:39,570
technology. That, to me is a
fascinating revelation that with

976
01:06:39,570 --> 01:06:43,080
the resources behind the US
government and the US military,

977
01:06:43,350 --> 01:06:47,310
they still could not fit the
cases into their own breakdown

978
01:06:47,550 --> 01:06:51,810
of mundane explanations of
logical explanations. They

979
01:06:51,810 --> 01:06:55,260
couldn't do it, not once. So I
think we have to look at that

980
01:06:55,260 --> 01:06:58,620
and see value that even though
we can't see under all of the

981
01:06:58,620 --> 01:07:03,120
black that we can't see all
under every redaction, we can

982
01:07:03,120 --> 01:07:06,510
start filling in some of the
blanks, and then start to

983
01:07:06,510 --> 01:07:10,620
question why why will they not
give us the capability of some

984
01:07:10,620 --> 01:07:13,890
of these craft? Now some of you
have may have heard me say in

985
01:07:13,890 --> 01:07:19,530
the past, that there is a a high
potential that some of these

986
01:07:19,530 --> 01:07:23,490
cases are military tech. And I
stand by that that's that's

987
01:07:23,520 --> 01:07:26,490
that's the definition of
potential. It could be it's a

988
01:07:26,490 --> 01:07:30,150
possibility. I got a lot of heat
for saying that on a Showtime

989
01:07:30,150 --> 01:07:34,770
documentary by JJ Abrams, where
I said it's possible that the

990
01:07:34,770 --> 01:07:39,930
2004 incident is a classified
platform classified piece of

991
01:07:39,930 --> 01:07:43,740
tech. I still stand by that,
even though the military

992
01:07:43,740 --> 01:07:46,830
doesn't. And and I'm
contradicting their own words

993
01:07:46,830 --> 01:07:51,000
here. I still think that we have
to wrestle with that possibility

994
01:07:51,000 --> 01:07:54,870
that things are being withheld,
maybe from a task force that

995
01:07:54,870 --> 01:07:58,560
created this, I believe it was
Christopher Mellon, who said

996
01:07:58,560 --> 01:08:01,680
that, that there were efforts
within the United States

997
01:08:01,680 --> 01:08:04,500
government and military to keep
all of the information from the

998
01:08:04,500 --> 01:08:09,090
Taskforce. Well, if that's true,
then we still have a possibility

999
01:08:09,090 --> 01:08:12,600
there. So I've been called out
by some of my haters about that,

1000
01:08:12,600 --> 01:08:15,720
and wanted to quickly address
it, as I don't feel that it's a

1001
01:08:15,720 --> 01:08:20,730
contradiction to accept. The
report says one thing, but also

1002
01:08:20,760 --> 01:08:24,900
the realization that the report
could be wrong. Because if if

1003
01:08:24,900 --> 01:08:27,570
what Christopher Mellon is
saying, and those surrounding

1004
01:08:27,570 --> 01:08:30,720
him have told him that the
taskforce did not get all of the

1005
01:08:30,720 --> 01:08:33,630
information, it is quite
possible that a highly

1006
01:08:33,630 --> 01:08:37,500
classified platform or piece of
technology with was withheld

1007
01:08:37,770 --> 01:08:40,980
from them. And so when they
create a document like this,

1008
01:08:40,980 --> 01:08:43,140
even though it's going to
Congress, you really think the

1009
01:08:43,140 --> 01:08:46,920
military cares if Congress is
misinformed, that when they

1010
01:08:46,920 --> 01:08:50,280
create it, and they are not
given every piece of the puzzle,

1011
01:08:50,490 --> 01:08:53,490
that there are going to be
errors. And I think that that's

1012
01:08:53,490 --> 01:08:58,800
why I stand by the possibility
that some of this is potentially

1013
01:08:58,800 --> 01:09:01,770
a classified platform, or a
piece of technology that we are

1014
01:09:01,770 --> 01:09:05,130
not aware of yet, or even that
the task force was being told

1015
01:09:05,130 --> 01:09:11,070
about all possibilities, all
good ideas, not only from me,

1016
01:09:11,070 --> 01:09:13,710
but from a lot of people out
there. But at the end of the

1017
01:09:13,710 --> 01:09:18,360
day, it's speculation because we
just don't know yet. I will keep

1018
01:09:18,360 --> 01:09:21,960
you guys informed of the appeal
process as well. As of the

1019
01:09:21,960 --> 01:09:26,760
recording of this, I have 90
days to respond with an appeal.

1020
01:09:27,450 --> 01:09:31,530
I will likely not wait anywhere
near that. But I like to take a

1021
01:09:31,530 --> 01:09:35,340
deep breath sometimes sleep on
it. Read the document a few

1022
01:09:35,340 --> 01:09:39,360
times. And you know what, even
doing videos like this, allow me

1023
01:09:39,360 --> 01:09:43,200
to see things while I'm talking
to all of you and to see your

1024
01:09:43,200 --> 01:09:46,380
questions that give me ideas on
how to fight some of these

1025
01:09:46,380 --> 01:09:50,310
redactions and sometimes see
things that I didn't see the

1026
01:09:50,310 --> 01:09:54,930
first, the second or the 3,000th
time I've read something. Doing

1027
01:09:54,930 --> 01:09:58,920
this is definitely a help for
me, as well. So thank you guys

1028
01:09:58,920 --> 01:10:00,990
for sticking through This deep
dive.

1029
01:10:01,230 --> 01:10:05,400
I don't do this level of detail
often, but I feel with this

1030
01:10:05,400 --> 01:10:08,220
particular document, it was
definitely warranted. And

1031
01:10:08,220 --> 01:10:10,680
hopefully it gave you guys an
idea that even though it is

1032
01:10:10,680 --> 01:10:13,740
frustrating, as I mentioned, you
look at the information and

1033
01:10:13,740 --> 01:10:17,580
really dissect every character.
And it tells a much different

1034
01:10:17,580 --> 01:10:20,580
story than just, uh, oh, they're
holding it from us. And I'm

1035
01:10:20,580 --> 01:10:24,840
really mad. Rather, it tells a
story in itself. So hopefully

1036
01:10:24,840 --> 01:10:28,110
you guys got some, some use out
of that. Please, if you could

1037
01:10:28,110 --> 01:10:30,210
help me out. As I said in the
beginning of the show, if you're

1038
01:10:30,210 --> 01:10:33,900
watching a thumbs up really does
help, make sure you're

1039
01:10:33,900 --> 01:10:37,320
subscribed to the channel. If
you feel so inclined. A lot of

1040
01:10:37,320 --> 01:10:41,340
this work is motivated and
supported by Patreon

1041
01:10:41,340 --> 01:10:44,940
subscribers. If you decide that
$1 A month or whatever you'd

1042
01:10:44,940 --> 01:10:47,940
like to do, it supports this
channel and these efforts

1043
01:10:47,940 --> 01:10:52,560
because sometimes it's it's not
cheap, and you do have to do

1044
01:10:52,560 --> 01:10:56,970
filing fees. On some occasions,
in some cases, reproduction,

1045
01:10:57,000 --> 01:11:01,680
search charges, all sorts of
stuff 100% of all of that super

1046
01:11:01,680 --> 01:11:06,840
chats. If you saw any come in on
the broadcasting of this 150% Go

1047
01:11:06,840 --> 01:11:10,530
to the channel. And hopefully
you guys see that when it comes

1048
01:11:10,530 --> 01:11:15,540
to the quality of what I try and
create for you. So truly, thank

1049
01:11:15,540 --> 01:11:18,600
you biggest help is spreading
the word. So even though you

1050
01:11:18,600 --> 01:11:21,540
decide not to do a Patreon,
don't worry, everything still

1051
01:11:21,540 --> 01:11:25,500
remains free. Nothing has ever
been behind a paywall on the

1052
01:11:25,500 --> 01:11:28,770
black vault COMM For more than
25 years since I started.

1053
01:11:28,980 --> 01:11:32,520
However, it really does help
support the site and allows me

1054
01:11:32,520 --> 01:11:36,690
to kind of expand the channel so
to speak. So with that, thank

1055
01:11:36,690 --> 01:11:39,660
you. I really do appreciate it.
I'm looking forward to reading

1056
01:11:39,660 --> 01:11:42,570
your comments. If you are
listening to the audio version,

1057
01:11:42,810 --> 01:11:45,720
any type of review helps on the
platform that you're you're

1058
01:11:45,720 --> 01:11:49,560
listening on whether it be
iTunes, or whatever, whatever it

1059
01:11:49,560 --> 01:11:53,610
may be. But also on YouTube,
please put your comments below.

1060
01:11:53,610 --> 01:11:56,430
Let me know what you think
questions I try and get to them.

1061
01:11:56,610 --> 01:12:00,930
And maybe we'll do a live stream
of a Colin show again. Get your

1062
01:12:00,930 --> 01:12:03,870
questions that way. Thank you so
much for listening again. This

1063
01:12:03,870 --> 01:12:06,480
is John Greenewald, Jr signing
off, and we'll see you next

1064
01:12:06,480 --> 01:12:06,780
time.